Trial reportBMC neuroscience2016
Greater improvement in LRRK2 G2019S patients undergoing Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation compared to non-mutation carriers.
Trial report in BMC neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motor and Non-motor Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation across the Genetic Panorama of Parkinson's Disease: A Multi-Scale Meta-Analysis.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Pooled it
- Deep brain stimulation for monogenic Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Association of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation With Motor, Functional, and Pharmacologic Outcomes in Patients With Monogenic Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of deep brain stimulation on early-onset Parkinson's disease with mutations in a Han Chinese Mainland population.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Early-onset Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Outcomes in LRRK2 Mutation Carriers Compared to Non-Carriers.Basic and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Surgicogenomics: The Role of Genetics in Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation alleviates oxidative stress via mitophagy in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Applicability of clinical genetic testing for deep brain stimulation treatment in monogenic Parkinson's disease and monogenic dystonia: a multidisciplinary team perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.Journal of internal medicine · 2022Review
- Precision Medicine in Parkinson's Disease: From Genetic Risk Signals to Personalized Therapy.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- BDNF rs6265 Genotype Influences Outcomes of Pharmacotherapy and Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2022Article
- Clinical profiles and outcomes of deep brain stimulation in G2019S LRRK2 Parkinson disease.Journal of neurosurgery · 2022Article
- The Role of Genetic Data in Selecting Device-Aided Therapies in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- The C-Terminal Domain of LRRK2 with the G2019S Substitution Increases Mutant A53T α-Synuclein Toxicity in Dopaminergic Neurons In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Gender Differences and Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Therapy of Parkinson's Disease Subtypes.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020Review
- Young Onset Parkinson's Disease: A Modern and Tailored Approach.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2020Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Mutations in Parkinson's Disease-Related Genes: A Systematic Review.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2019Review
- G2019S Variation in LRRK2: An Ideal Model for the Study of Parkinson's Disease?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
- Effect of LRRK2 G2385R Variant on Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Efficacy in Parkinson's Disease in a Han Chinese Population.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) of parkinson's disease (PD) patients has demonstrated to improve motor performance and to reduce dopa-induced dyskinesia. An association between the occurrence of dyskinesias and LRRK2 (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2) G2019S gene mutations has recently been suggested. The aim of this study is to discover the impact of the G2019S mutation (with high incidence in the authors' native Algeria) on the symptom response of PD in patients who underwent STN-DBS.
methodsWe carried out a comparative statistical study for the clinical evaluation and neuropsychological assessment of 27 Algerian PD STN-DBS patients, both G2019S mutation carriers (MC) and non-carriers (NC). A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was then conducted to compare the results with those from groups of individuals with similar modalities.
resultsThe MCA revealed that MC and NC PD patients showed two different patterns of clinical evaluations. The group of idiopathic patients showed some differences compared to the clinical evaluations, depending on gender. No association was found between the G2019S mutation and the Mini Mental State Examination scores (MMSE), and MC patients appeared more susceptible to dyskinesia than NC patients. In NC patients, we found two cases with Parkin mutations who had a different "honeymoon" period and different initial symptoms. The results showed considerable improvement of motor unified parkinson's disease rating scale III (UPDRS-III) in a situation of stimulation without medication in the MC patients with a percentage of improvement (51.1 %) over the required 30 % compared to the NC patients (25.5 %). The same result was observed for the Schwab and England's activities of daily living scale (S and E scale), which thus demonstrated a greater effectiveness of DBS for MC patients than for NC patients. However, the Hoehn and Yahr scale (H and Y Scale) showed the same significance in a situation of stimulation for MC and NC patients. In this later group, the best scores of UPDRS-III were observed for patients with the Parkin mutation before they underwent surgery.
conclusionsThis study shows that surgical treatment probably has a more significant impact on LRRK2 G2019S MC than on idiopathic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.