ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2016
Evidence-based approach to the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa, based on the European guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa.
Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 237 citations in OpenAlex.
- European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Guideline
- To what Extent does Vitamin D and its Serum Levels Influence the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Literature Review.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Pooled it
- Guidelines How to Integrate Surgery and Targeted Therapy with Biologics for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Delphi Consensus Statements from an Italian Expert Panel.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Guideline
- Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: a practical framework for treatment optimization - systematic review and recommendations from the HS ALLIANCE working group.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2019Pooled it
- Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaPooled it
- LAight® Therapy Is an Effective Treatment Option to Maintain Long-Term Remission of Hurley I and II Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Results from Period B of RELIEVE, a Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Trial
- Botulinum Toxin Type B for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2020Trial
- Review
- How Organ Manifestations Beyond the Bone May Guide Risk Stratification and Treatment Decisions in Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Local Therapies in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Treatment Landscape and Current Issues.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Management of penoscrotal hidradenitis: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Potential Role of Ozenoxacin 1% Cream in the Topical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Single-centre Experience (44 patients).Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive management of hidradenitis suppurativa using a 1470 nm diode laser: a step-by-step description of our technique.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Real-World Survey from the EU5 and USA.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A marker of systemic inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa patients without cardiovascular disease: aortic arch calcification.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Comparing antibiotic prescribing patterns for hidradenitis suppurativa between dermatology and non-dermatology ambulatory providers.Skin health and disease · 2024Article
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Elderly Patients: Clinical and Therapeutical Outcomes-A Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Review
- Treatment Strategies in Neutrophilic Dermatoses: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Characteristics and treatment pathways in pediatric and adult hidradenitis suppurativa: An examination using real world data.JAAD international · 2023Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful, recurrent nodules and abscesses that rupture and lead to sinus tracts and scarring. To date, an evidence-based therapeutic approach has not been the standard of care and this is likely due to the lack of evidence based treatment guidelines. The purpose of this study was to promote a holistic evidence-based approach which implemented Level of Evidence and Strength of Recommendation for the treatment of HS. Based upon the European Dermatology Forumguidelines for the management of HS, evidence-based approach was explored for the treatment of HS. The diagnosis of HS should be made by a dermatologist or other healthcare professional with expert knowledge in HS. All patients should be offered adjuvant therapy as needed (pain management, weight loss, tobacco cessation, treatment of super infections, and application of appropriate dressings). The treating physician should be familiar with disease severity scores, especially Hurley staging, physician global assessment and others. The routine use of patient'reported outcomesincluding DLQI, itch and pain assessment (Visual Analogue Scale) is strongly recommended. The need for surgical intervention should be assessed in all patients depending upon type and extent of scarring, and an evidence-based surgical approach should be implemented. Evidence-based medical treatment of mild disease consists of topical Clindamycin 1 % solution/gel b.i.d. for 12 weeks or Tetracycline 500 p.o. b.i.d. for 4 months (LOE IIb, SOR B), for more widespread disease. If patient fails to exhibit response to treatment or for a PGA of moderate-to-severe disease, Clindamycin 300 p.o. b.i.d. with Rifampicin 600 p.o. o.d. for 10 weeks (LOE III, SOR C) should be considered. If patient is not improved, then Adalimumab 160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2; then 40 mg subcutaneously weekly should be administered (LOE Ib, SOR A). If improvement occurs then therapy should be maintained as long as HS lesions are present. If the patient fails to exhibit response, then consideration of second or third line therapy is required. A growing body of evidence is being published to guide the treatment of HS. HS therapy should be based upon the evaluation of the inflammatory components as well as the scarring and should be directed by evidence-based guidelines. Treatment should include surgery as well as medical treatment. Future studies should include benefit risk ratio analysis and long term assessment of efficacy and safety, in order to facilitate long term evidence based treatment and rational pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.