ReviewSeminars in perinatology2016
Teaching and assessing ethics in the newborn ICU.
Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-fidelity simulation programs in ICU-related ethical non-technical skills training: A narrative review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Review
- The Pediatric Ethics & Professionalism Assessment Tool (Pedi-EPAT): Development and implementation of a novel, competency-based assessment.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Uninformed Origins: Should We Be Advising Parents on the Source of Medicines and Therapies?Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2023Article
- Developing a digitally innovative ethics and professionalism curriculum for neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows: a 3-year multicenter pilot study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Article
- Decision making at extreme prematurity: Innovation in clinician education.Seminars in perinatology · 2022Article
- Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Needs assessment of ethics and communication teaching for neonatal perinatal medicine programs in Canada.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019Article
- Assessing Ethics Knowledge: Development of a Test of Ethics Knowledge in Neonatology.The Journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Ethics and professionalism education has become increasingly recognized as important and incorporated into graduate medical education. However, such education has remained largely unstructured and understudied in neonatology. Neonatal-perinatal fellowship training programs have generally grappled with how best to teach and assess ethics and professionalism knowledge, skills, and behavior in clinical practice, particularly in light of accreditation requirements, milestones, and competencies. This article reviews currently available teaching methods, pedagogy, and resources in medical ethics, professionalism, and communication, as well as assessment strategies and tools, to help medical educators and practicing clinicians ensure trainees achieve and maintain competency. The need for consensus and future research in these domains is also highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.