Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831208›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2016

Distinct Reward Properties are Encoded via Corticostriatal Interactions.

David V Smith, Anastasia E Rigney, Mauricio R Delgado

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David V SmithDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Anastasia E RigneyDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Mauricio R DelgadoDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

Funding

Modulation of Human Reward Circuitry by Social FactorsR01MH084081 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI DELGADO, MAURICIO R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Parsing Reward: Identifying Distinct Neural Pathways for Specific Reward PropertiesF32MH107175 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI SMITH, DAVID VICTOR · 2015 to 2016
$100k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH107175NIMH NIH HHS F32-MH107175NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084081NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH084081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The striatum serves as a critical brain region for reward processing. Yet, understanding the link between striatum and reward presents a challenge because rewards are composed of multiple properties. Notably, affective properties modulate emotion while informative properties help obtain future rewards. We approached this problem by emphasizing affective and informative reward properties within two independent guessing games. We found that both reward properties evoked activation within the nucleus accumbens, a subregion of the striatum. Striatal responses to informative, but not affective, reward properties predicted subsequent utilization of information for obtaining monetary reward. We hypothesized that activation of the striatum may be necessary but not sufficient to encode distinct reward properties. To investigate this possibility, we examined whether affective and informative reward properties were differentially encoded in corticostriatal interactions. Strikingly, we found that the striatum exhibited dissociable connectivity patterns with the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, with increasing connectivity for affective reward properties and decreasing connectivity for informative reward properties. Our results demonstrate that affective and informative reward properties are encoded via corticostriatal interactions. These findings highlight how corticostriatal systems contribute to reward processing, potentially advancing models linking striatal activation to behavior.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalRewardAdolescentAdultComprehensionEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleNucleus AccumbensPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID26831208
PMCPMC4735713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.