Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831111›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

An ecocultural model predicts Neanderthal extinction through competition with modern humans.

William Gilpin, Marcus W Feldman, Kenichi Aoki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of musical pitch in long-distance defensive signaling.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Phase synchronization between culture and climate forcing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. On the absence of a correlation between population size and 'toolkit size' in ethnographic hunter-gatherers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Integrative studies of cultural evolution: crossing disciplinary boundaries to produce new insights.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William GilpinDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305;
Marcus W FeldmanDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305; mfeldman@stanford.edu.
Kenichi AokiOrganization for the Strategic Coordination of Research and Intellectual Properties, Meiji University, Tokyo 164-8525, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaeologists argue that the replacement of Neanderthals by modern humans was driven by interspecific competition due to a difference in culture level. To assess the cogency of this argument, we construct and analyze an interspecific cultural competition model based on the Lotka-Volterra model, which is widely used in ecology, but which incorporates the culture level of a species as a variable interacting with population size. We investigate the conditions under which a difference in culture level between cognitively equivalent species, or alternatively a difference in underlying learning ability, may produce competitive exclusion of a comparatively (although not absolutely) large local Neanderthal population by an initially smaller modern human population. We find, in particular, that this competitive exclusion is more likely to occur when population growth occurs on a shorter timescale than cultural change, or when the competition coefficients of the Lotka-Volterra model depend on the difference in the culture levels of the interacting species.

Indexed as

Cultural EvolutionExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsCognitionCompetitive BehaviorEcosystemHumansModels, PsychologicalModels, TheoreticalNeanderthalsPopulation DensityPopulation GrowthSpecies Specificitycultural evolutionfeedbackLotka−VolterraPaleolithicreplacement

Identifiers

PMID26831111
PMCPMC4776499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.