Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26831010›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Identification of two novel Chlorotoxin derivatives CA4 and CTX-23 with chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenic potential.

Tengfei Xu, Zheng Fan, Wenxin Li, Barbara Dietel, Yingliang Wu, Matthias W Beckmann, Jana K Wrosch, Michael Buchfelder, Ilker Y Eyupoglu, Zhijian Cao and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Network Pharmacology Identifies the Mechanisms of Action of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tengfei XuTranslational Neurooncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Zheng FanTranslational Neurooncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Wenxin LiState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 P.R. China.
Barbara DietelTranslational Research Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Yingliang WuState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 P.R. China.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, &Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jana K WroschDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael BuchfelderTranslational Neurooncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Ilker Y EyupogluTranslational Neurooncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Zhijian CaoState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 P.R. China.
Nicolai E SavaskanTranslational Neurooncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen - Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are fast proliferating and destructive within the brain microenvironment. Effective chemotherapeutic strategies are currently lacking which combat this deadly disease curatively. The glioma-specific chloride ion channel represents a specific target for therapy. Chlorotoxin (CTX), a peptide derived from scorpion venom, has been shown to be specific and efficacious in blocking glioma Cl(-) channel activity. Here, we report on two new derivatives (termed CA4 and CTX-23) designed and generated on the basis of the peptide sequence alignments of CTX and BmKCT. The novel peptides CA4 and CTX-23 are both effective in reducing glioma cell proliferation. In addition, CTX, CA4 and CTX-23 impact on cell migration and spheroid migration. These effects are accompanied by diminished cell extensions and increased nuclear sizes. Furthermore, we found that CA4 and CTX-23 are selective with low toxicity against primary neurons and astrocytes. In the ex vivo VOGiM, which maintain the entire brain tumor microenvironment, both CTX and CA4 display anti-tumor activity and reduce tumor volume. Hence, CTX and CA4 reveal anti-angiogenic properties with endothelial and angiogenic hotspots disrupting activities. These data report on the identification of two novel CTX derivatives with multiple anti-glioma properties including anti-angiogenesis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationHumansRatsScorpion VenomsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsChlorotoxinScorpion Venoms

Identifiers

PMID26831010
PMCPMC4735682
OpenAlexW2261357541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.