Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26830963›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2016

Multiple Non-Equivalent Interfaces Mediate Direct Activation of GABAA Receptors by Propofol.

Megan M Eaton, Allison L Germann, Ruby Arora, Lily Q Cao, Xiaoyi Gao, Daniel J Shin, Albert Wu, David C Chiara, Jonathan B Cohen, Joe Henry Steinbach and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Potentiation of the GABABiophysical journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modulation of the mammalian GABABritish journal of pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of Modulation of theMolecular pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan M Eaton
Allison L Germann
Ruby Arora
Lily Q Cao
Xiaoyi Gao
Daniel J Shin
Albert Wu
David C Chiara
Jonathan B Cohen
Joe Henry Steinbach
Alex S Evers
Gustav AkkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University, Campus Box 8054, 660 South Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Washington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Synthetic Chemistry CoreP01GM058448 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILLER, KEITH W · 1999 to 2018
$33.6M
MOLECULAR SITES OF NEUROSTEROID BINDINGR01GM108799 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVERS, ALEX S. · 2014 to 2022
$4.0M
SYNERGISTIC ACTIONS OF INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICSR01GM108580 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AKK, GUSTAV · 2014 to 2021
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM058448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108580NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropofol is a sedative agent that at clinical concentrations acts by allosterically activating or potentiating the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor. Mutational, modeling, and photolabeling studies with propofol and its analogues have identified potential interaction sites in the transmembrane domain of the receptor. At the "+" of the β subunit, in the β-α interface, meta-azipropofol labels the M286 residue in the third transmembrane domain. Substitution of this residue with tryptophan results in loss of potentiation by propofol. At the "-" side of the β subunit, in the α-β interface (or β-β interface, in the case of homomeric β receptors), ortho-propofol diazirine labels the H267 residue in the second transmembrane domain. Structural modeling indicates that the β(H267) residue lines a cavity that docks propofol with favorable interaction energy.

methodWe used two-electrode voltage clamp to determine the functional effects of mutations to the "+" and "-" sides of the β subunit on activation of the α1β3 GABAA receptor by propofol.

resultsWe found that while the individual mutations had a small effect, the combination of the M286W mutation with tryptophan mutations of selected residues at the α-β interface leads to strong reduction in gating efficacy for propofol.

conclusionWe conclude that α1β3 GABAA receptors can be activated by propofol interactions with the β-β, α-β, and β-α interfaces, where distinct, non-equivalent regions control channel gating. Any interface can mediate activation, hence substitutions at all interfaces are required for loss of activation by propofol.

Indexed as

AnimalsGABA AgentsHumansModels, MolecularMutationPropofolReceptors, GABA-AGABA AgentsPropofolReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID26830963
PMCPMC5050400
OpenAlexW2399456797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.