ArticleCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2016
Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.
Article in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.International orthopaedics · 2024Pooled it
- Patients with prior hip arthroscopy have worse outcomes after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a matched cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an early-stage prototype polyurethane femoral head implant for hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Hip resurfacing: case closed? A bibliometric analysis of the past 10 years.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Comparisons of in-hospital complications between total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Midterm results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: a single-surgeon series.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Living with a recalled implant: a qualitative study of patients' experiences with ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Patient safety in surgery · 2021Article
- The Effect of Travel Distance on Outcomes for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a High-Volume Center.Arthroplasty today · 2020Article
- Hip resurfacing arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Implant-specific outcomes and risk factors for failure.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2020Article
- Gait after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: an age-matched controlled prospective study.The bone & joint journal · 2019Article
- Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Observational
- Computer-assisted Navigation in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Case Study utilizing the ReCap Femoral Resurfacing System.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2019Article
- A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Activity levels following hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A tool to help manage patient expectations.Journal of orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Biomimetic Multispiked Connecting Ti-Alloy Scaffold Prototype for Entirely-Cementless Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses-Exemplary Results of Implantation of the Ca-P Surface-Modified Scaffold Prototypes in Animal Model and Osteoblast Culture Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is an alternative to conventional, stemmed total hip arthroplasty (THA). The best reported results are young, active patients with good bone stock and a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Since the 1990s, metal-on-metal (MoM) HRA has achieved excellent outcomes when used in the appropriate patient population. Concerns regarding the metal-on-metal bearing surface including adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) to metal debris have recently lead to a decline in the use of this construct. The current paper aims to provide an updated review on HRA, including a critical review of the most recent literature on HRA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.