Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26830818›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2016

Challenges in the retrospective assessment of trauma: comparing a checklist approach to a single item trauma experience screening question.

Souci Frissa, Stephani L Hatch, Nicola T Fear, Sarah Dorrington, Laura Goodwin, Matthew Hotopf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A review on the utility of sensitivity analysis in trauma research: Methods and challenges from recent trauma studies.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Souci FrissaAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, BRC nucleus, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. Souci.1.frissa@kcl.ac.uk.
Stephani L HatchAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, BRC nucleus, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. stephani.hatch@kcl.ac.uk.
Nicola T FearAcademic Department of Military Mental Health and King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, UK. nicola.t.fear@kcl.ac.uk.
Sarah DorringtonAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, BRC nucleus, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. sarah.dorrington@kcl.ac.uk.
Laura GoodwinAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, BRC nucleus, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. laura.goodwin@kcl.ac.uk.
Matthew HotopfAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, BRC nucleus, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. matthew.hotopf@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on trauma and its impact on mental health typically relies on self-reports which can be influenced by recall bias and an individual's subjective interpretation of events. This study aims to compare responses on a checklist of life events with a trauma experience screening question, both of which assessed trauma experience retrospectively.

methodsA community sample of adults were asked about life events from a checklist before asking them whether they ever had a trauma experience, i.e. "an event that either puts them or someone close to them at risk of serious harm or death".

resultsLess than half of the sample who reported at least one life event on the checklist that qualified as a trauma reported a trauma experience that they perceived put them or close others at risk of serious harm. Women responders, those reporting early life traumas, and a greater number of lifetime trauma events were more likely to report a trauma experience. Current symptoms of Common Mental Disorder did not account for differences in reporting of trauma experiences.

conclusionsEpidemiological approaches which require participants to make subjective judgement on the severity of the trauma experience will capture individual differences that we have shown are influenced by gender and previous trauma experience.

Indexed as

ChecklistLife Change EventsMental RecallAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLondonMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26830818
PMCPMC4736664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.