ArticleBMC genomics2016
Structure, phylogeny, allelic haplotypes and expression of sucrose transporter gene families in Saccharum.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting the Molecular Roadmap for Sugar Crops: Genome Reading, Trait Writing and Variety Redesigning.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Genome-wide identification of HCT gene family in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) and characterization of putative cis-elements in gene regulation.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Integrated comparative transcriptomics and WGCNA reveal the core transcriptional network and hub genes regulating sucrose accumulation in Saccharum spp.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Towards a Holistic View of the Orchestration Between Sugar Transporters in Cereal Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide analysis of the cellulose synthase gene family in autopolyploid sugarcane (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- From acidity to sweetness: a comprehensive review of carbon accumulation in grape berries.Molecular horticulture · 2024Review
- Current perspectives on the regulatory mechanisms of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Genomic investigation of duplication, functional conservation, and divergence in the LRR-RLK Family of Saccharum.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Molecular evaluation and phenotypic screening of brown and orange rust in Saccharum germplasm.PloS one · 2024Article
- Bulbil initiation: a comprehensive review on resources, development, and utilisation, with emphasis on molecular mechanisms, advanced technologies, and future prospects.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- A complete gap-free diploid genome in Saccharum complex and the genomic footprints of evolution in the highly polyploid Saccharum genus.Nature plants · 2023Article
- Characterization and expression profiles of the B-box gene family during plant growth and under low-nitrogen stress in Saccharum.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Haplotype variations of sucrose phosphate synthase B gene among sugarcane accessions with different sucrose content.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of the growth-regulating factor family in Saccharum.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Functional characterization and analysis of transcriptional regulation of sugar transporter SWEET13c in sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Hetero/Homo-Complexes of Sucrose Transporters May Be a Subtle Mode to Regulate Sucrose Transportation in Grape Berries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Genomic analysis of SBP gene family in Saccharum spontaneum reveals their association with vegetative and reproductive development.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Comparative phylogenetic analysis of CBL reveals the gene family evolution and functional divergence in Saccharum spontaneum.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of DREB genes in Saccharum spontaneum.BMC genomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSugarcane is an economically important crop contributing to about 80% of the world sugar production. Increasing efforts in molecular biological studies have been performed for improving the sugar yield and other relevant important agronomic traits. However, due to sugarcane's complicated genomes, it is still challenging to study the genetic basis of traits, such as sucrose accumulation. Sucrose transporters (SUTs) are critical for both phloem loading in source tissue and sucrose uptaking in sink tissue, and are considered to be the control points for regulating sucrose storage. However, no genomic study for sugarcane sucrose transporter (SsSUT) families has been reported up to date.
resultsBy using comparative genomics and bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), six SUT genes were identified and characterized in S. spontaenum. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the two pairs SsSUTs (SsSUT1/SsSUT3 and SsSUT5/SsSUT6) could be clustered together into two separate monocot specific SUT groups, while SsSUT2 and SsSUT4 were separated into the other two groups, with members from both dicot and monocot species. Gene structure comparison demonstrated that the number and position of exons/introns in SUTs were highly conserved among the close orthologs; in contrast, there were variations among the paralogous SUTs in Sacchuarm. Though with the high polyploidy level, gene allelic haplotype comparative analysis showed that the examined four SsSUT members exhibited conservations of gene structures and amino acid sequences among the allelic haplotypes accompanied by variations of intron sizes. Gene expression analyses were performed for tissues from seedlings under drought stress and mature plants of three Saccharum species (S.officinarnum, S.spotaneum and S.robustum). Both SUT1 and SUT4 expressed abundantly at different conditions. SUT2 had similar expression level in all of the examined tissues, but SUT3 was undetectable. Both of SUT5 and SUT6 had lower expression level than other gene member, and expressed stronger in source leaves and are likely to play roles in phloem loading. In the seeding plant leave under water stress, four genes SUT1, SUT2, SUT4 and SUT5 were detectable. In these detectable genes, SUT1 and SUT4 were down regulated, while, SUT2 and SUT5 were up regulated.
conclusionsIn this study, we presented the first comprehensive genomic study for a whole gene family, the SUT family, in Saccharum. We speculated that there were six SUT members in the S. spotaneum genome. Out of the six members, SsSUTs, SsSUT5 and SsSUT6 were recent duplication genes accompanied by rapid evolution, while, SsSUT2 and SsSUT4 were the ancient members in the families. Despite the high polypoidy genome, functional redundancy may not exist among the SUTs allelic haplotypes supported by the evidence of strong purifying selection of the gene allele. SUT3 could be a low active member in the family because it is undetectable in our study, but it might not be a pseudogene because it harbored integrated gene structure. SUT1 and SUT4 were the main members for the sucrose transporter, while, these SUTs had sub-functional divergence in response to sucrose accumulation and plant development in Saccharum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.