Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26830404›Full record

ReviewHead and neck pathology2016

Pathology of Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Review.

Kathleen T Montone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Head and neck pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Clinicopathological and microbiological study of fungal rhinosinusitis treated with endoscopic surgery.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Eosinophils and the Head and Neck.Head and neck pathology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) combined with quantitative PCR: cutting-edge methods for rapid diagnosis of non-invasive fungal rhinosinusitis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kathleen T MontoneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 6 Founders, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. kmontone@mail.med.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-0611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) comprises a spectrum of disease processes that vary in clinical presentation, histologic appearances, and biological significance. FRS can be acute or chronic and is most commonly classified as non-invasive or invasive based on whether fungi have invaded into tissue. This manuscript will review the pathologic classification of FRS.

Indexed as

HumansMycosesRhinitisSinusitisAcute invasive fungal rhinosinusitisAllergic fungal rhinosinusitisAllergic mucinAspergillusFungal ballRhinosinusitis

Identifiers

PMID26830404
PMCPMC4746136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.