Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26830029›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Assessing the effectiveness of enhanced psychological care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.

Suzanne H Richards, Chris Dickens, Rob Anderson, David A Richards, Rod S Taylor, Obioha C Ukoumunne, David Kessler, Katrina Turner, Willem Kuyken, Manish Gandhi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne H RichardsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. s.h.richards@exeter.ac.uk.
Chris DickensUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. c.m.dickens@exeter.ac.uk.
Rob AndersonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. r.anderson@exeter.ac.uk.
David A RichardsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. d.a.richards@exeter.ac.uk.
Rod S TaylorUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. r.taylor@exeter.ac.uk.
Obioha C UkoumunneNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for the South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. o.c.ukoumunne@exeter.ac.uk.
David KesslerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. david.kessler@bristol.ac.uk.
Katrina TurnerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. katrina.turner@bristol.ac.uk.
Willem KuykenUniversity Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, 0X3 7JX, UK. willem.kuyken@psych.ox.ac.uk.
Manish GandhiRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK. manish.gandhi@nhs.net.
Luke KnightRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK. luke.knight@nhs.net.
Andrew GibsonHealth and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK. andy.gibson@uwe.ac.uk.
Antoinette DaveyUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. antoinette.davey@exeter.ac.uk.
Fiona WarrenUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. f.c.warren@exeter.ac.uk.
Rachel WinderUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. r.e.winder@exeter.ac.uk.
Christine WrightUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. c.a.wright@exeter.ac.uk.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. john.campbell@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/189/06Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround 17% of people eligible for UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes following an acute coronary syndrome report moderate or severe depressive symptoms. While maximising psychological health is a core goal of cardiac rehabilitation, psychological care can be fragmented and patchy. This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of embedding enhanced psychological care, composed of two management strategies of proven effectiveness in other settings (nurse-led mental health care coordination and behavioural activation), within the cardiac rehabilitation care pathway. METHODS/

designThis study tests the uncertainties associated with a large-scale evaluation by conducting an external pilot trial with a nested qualitative study. We aim to recruit and randomise eight comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation teams (clusters) to intervention (embedding enhanced psychological care into routine cardiac rehabilitation programmes) or control (routine cardiac rehabilitation programmes alone) arms. Up to 64 patients (eight per team) identified with depressive symptoms upon initial assessment by the cardiac rehabilitation team will be recruited, and study measures will be administered at baseline (before starting rehabilitation) and at 5 months and 8 months post baseline. Outcomes include depressive symptoms, cardiac mortality and morbidity, anxiety, health-related quality of life and service resource use. Trial data on cardiac team and patient recruitment, and the retention and flow of patients through treatment will be used to assess intervention feasibility and acceptability. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken to explore trial participants' and cardiac rehabilitation nurses' views and experiences of the trial methods and intervention, and to identify reasons why patients declined to take part in the trial. Outcome data will inform a sample size calculation for a definitive trial. DISCUSSION: The pilot trial and qualitative study will inform the design of a fully powered cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the provision of enhanced psychological care within cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

trial registrationISRCTN34701576 (Registered 29 May 2014).

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyAcute Coronary SyndromeAntidepressive AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisData CollectionDepressionHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SafetyPatient SelectionPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSample SizeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID26830029
PMCPMC4736496
OpenAlexW2264684197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.