Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26829949›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2016

Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetus: how does it help?

Luis F Gonçalves

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advanced 3D Visualization and 3D Printing in Radiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The etiopathogenic and morphological spectrum of anencephaly: a comprehensive review of literature.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis F GonçalvesDepartment of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Beaumont Health System,, Divisions of Pediatric Radiology and Fetal Imaging,, 360 W. 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. luis.goncalves@beaumont.edu.
Beaumont Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional ultrasonography (3-D US) was introduced to the field of fetal imaging in the early 1990s. Since then several publications have described potential applications for the diagnosis of congenital malformations as well as organ volumetry. This article reviews basic principles of 3-D US as well as its clinical applicability to prenatal diagnosis of abnormalities involving the face, spine and skeletal system, as well as potential applications of 3-D US for fetal cardiovascular and neuroimaging. Limitations related to motion artifacts, acoustic shadowing and barriers to clinical implementation of 3-D US in clinical practice are addressed.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesFetal DiseasesHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Prenatal3-D ultrasound4-D ultrasoundFetusPrenatal diagnosisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID26829949
OpenAlexW2300988107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.