Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26829287›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2016

Targeted pulmonary delivery of inducers of host macrophage autophagy as a potential host-directed chemotherapy of tuberculosis.

Anuradha Gupta, Amit Misra, Vojo Deretic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Upper respiratory tract commensalJournal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Macrophage Response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Host-targeted therapy for tuberculosis: Time to revisit the concept.The Indian journal of medical research · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anuradha GuptaCSIR Central Drug Research Institute, Sector 10A, Janakipuram Extension, Mohiuddinpur, Lucknow 226031, India.
Amit MisraCSIR Central Drug Research Institute, Sector 10A, Janakipuram Extension, Mohiuddinpur, Lucknow 226031, India. Electronic address: amit_misra@cdri.res.in.
Vojo DereticMolecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: vderetic@salud.unm.edu.
Central Drug Research Institute · INUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Autophagy Against Tuberculosis and HIVR01AI111935 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI DERETIC, VOJO P · 2014 to 2023
$7.0M
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Autophagy in Mtb Control in AIDSR01AI042999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI DERETIC, VOJO P · 1998 to 2017
$6.6M
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Autophagy in Mtb Control in AIDSR37AI042999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI VOJO P DERETIC · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111935NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI042999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the promising host-directed chemotherapeutic interventions in tuberculosis (TB) is based on inducing autophagy as an immune effector. Here we consider the strengths and weaknesses of potential autophagy-based pharmacological intervention. Using the existing drugs that induce autophagy is an option, but it has limitations given the broad role of autophagy in most cells, tissues, and organs. Thus, it may be desirable that the agent being used to modulate autophagy is applied in a targeted manner, e.g. delivered to affected tissues, with infected macrophages being an obvious choice. This review addresses the advantages and disadvantages of delivering drugs to induce autophagy in M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages. One option, already being tested in models, is to design particles for inhalation delivery to lung macrophages. The choice of drugs, drug release kinetics and intracellular residence times, non-target cell exposure and feasibility of use by patients is discussed. We term here this (still experimental) approach, of compartment-targeting, autophagy-based, host-directed therapy as "Track-II antituberculosis chemotherapy."

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsMycobacterium tuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsAutophagyHumansMacrophagesTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsAerosolsApoptosisHost-pathogen interactionInhalationsMicroautophagyPhagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID26829287
PMCPMC5285306
OpenAlexW2254988052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.