Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26829227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Methylation Markers for the Identification of Body Fluids and Tissues from Forensic Trace Evidence.

Sophia Forat, Bruno Huettel, Richard Reinhardt, Rolf Fimmers, Gerhard Haidl, Dominik Denschlag, Klaus Olek

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetic analyses in forensic medicine: future and challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developments in forensic DNA analysis.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Forensic Epigenetic Analysis: The Path Ahead.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia ForatLabor für Abstammungsbegutachtungen GmbH, Rheinbach, Germany.
Bruno HuettelMax Planck Genome Centre Cologne Institute for Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Richard ReinhardtMax Planck Genome Centre Cologne Institute for Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Rolf FimmersInstitute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Gerhard HaidlDepartment of Dermatology, Andrology Unit, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dominik DenschlagDepartment of OB/GYN Hochtaunuskliniken Bad Homburg, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Klaus OlekLabor für Abstammungsbegutachtungen GmbH, Rheinbach, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEAccadis Hochschule Bad Homburg · DEInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of body fluids is an essential tool for clarifying the course of events at a criminal site. The analytical problem is the fact that the biological material has been very often exposed to detrimental exogenous influences. Thereby, the molecular substrates used for the identification of the traces may become degraded. So far, most protocols utilize cell specific proteins or RNAs. Instead of measuring these more sensitive compounds this paper describes the application of the differential DNA-methylation. As a result of two genome wide screenings with the Illumina HumanMethylation BeadChips 27 and 450k we identified 150 candidate loci revealing differential methylation with regard to the body fluids venous blood, menstrual blood, vaginal fluid, saliva and sperm. Among them we selected 9 loci as the most promising markers. For the final determination of the methylation degree we applied the SNuPE-method. Because the degree of methylation might be modified by various endogenous and exogenous factors, we tested each marker with approximately 100 samples of each target fluid in a validation study. The stability of the detection procedure is proved in various simulated forensic surroundings according to standardized conditions. We studied the potential influence of 12 relatively common tumors on the methylation of the 9 markers. For this purpose the target fluids of 34 patients have been analysed. Only the cervix carcinoma might have an remarkable effect because impairing the signal of both vaginal markers. Using the Illumina MiSeq device we tested the potential influence of cis acting sequence variants on the methylation degree of the 9 markers in the specific body fluid DNA of 50 individuals. For 4 marker loci we observed such an influence either by sole SNPs or haplotypes. The identification of each target fluid is possible in arbitrary mixtures with the remaining four body fluids. The sensitivity of the individual body fluid tests is in the same range as for the forensic STR-analysis. It is the first forensic body fluid protocol which considers the exogenic and endogenic parameters potentially interfering with the true results.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsOrgan SpecificityBiomarkersBody FluidsComputer SimulationDiscriminant AnalysisDNA MethylationFemaleGenetic LociGenome, HumanHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26829227
PMCPMC4734623
OpenAlexW2253701335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.