Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26828740›Full record

ReviewHearing research2016

Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.

Ruth Y Litovsky, Karen Gordon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A deep learning framework for understanding cochlear implants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Comparing Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients in a Novel Speech-in-Noise and Localization Task.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Pulse timing dominates binaural hearing with cochlear implants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruth Y LitovskyUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1500 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, United States. Electronic address: litovsky@waisman.wisc.edu.
Karen GordonUniversity of Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Directional Hearing in Complex Auditory EnvironmentsR01DC003083 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2004 to 2020
$7.4M
Spatial Hearing in Children with Normal Hearing and Bilateral Cochlear ImplantsR01DC008365 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2007 to 2018
$4.6M
CIHR MOP-130420CIHR MOP-89804CIHR MOP-97924NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003083NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial hearing skills are essential for children as they grow, learn and play. These skills provide critical cues for determining the locations of sources in the environment, and enable segregation of important sounds, such as speech, from background maskers or interferers. Spatial hearing depends on availability of monaural cues and binaural cues. The latter result from integration of inputs arriving at the two ears from sounds that vary in location. The binaural system has exquisite mechanisms for capturing differences between the ears in both time of arrival and intensity. The major cues that are thus referred to as being vital for binaural hearing are: interaural differences in time (ITDs) and interaural differences in levels (ILDs). In children with normal hearing (NH), spatial hearing abilities are fairly well developed by age 4-5 years. In contrast, most children who are deaf and hear through cochlear implants (CIs) do not have an opportunity to experience normal, binaural acoustic hearing early in life. These children may function by having to utilize auditory cues that are degraded with regard to numerous stimulus features. In recent years there has been a notable increase in the number of children receiving bilateral CIs, and evidence suggests that while having two CIs helps them function better than when listening through a single CI, these children generally perform worse than their NH peers. This paper reviews some of the recent work on bilaterally implanted children. The focus is on measures of spatial hearing, including sound localization, release from masking for speech understanding in noise and binaural sensitivity using research processors. Data from behavioral and electrophysiological studies are included, with a focus on the recent work of the authors and their collaborators. The effects of auditory plasticity and deprivation on the emergence of binaural and spatial hearing are discussed along with evidence for reorganized processing from both behavioral and electrophysiological studies. The consequences of both unilateral and bilateral auditory deprivation during development suggest that the relevant set of issues is highly complex with regard to successes and the limitations experienced by children receiving bilateral cochlear implants. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Annual Reviews 2016>.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearingAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionChildChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing TestsHumansInfantNoisePersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID26828740
PMCPMC5647834
OpenAlexW2291841188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.