ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Kernel Architecture of the Genetic Circuitry of the Arabidopsis Circadian System.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the plant clock: a review of mathematical models for the circadian regulatory network.Plant molecular biology · 2024Review
- Generalized Michaelis-Menten rate law with time-varying molecular concentrations.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- WRKY2 and WRKY10 regulate the circadian expression ofPlant communications · 2022Article
- A spatial model of the plant circadian clock reveals design principles for coordinated timing.Molecular systems biology · 2022Article
- Restoring circadian gene profiles in clock networks using synthetic feedback control.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Article
- Modelling of plant circadian clock for characterizing hypocotyl growth under different light quality conditions.In silico plants · 2022Article
- Universality in kinetic models of circadian rhythms inJournal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Circadian Rhythms in Legumes: What Do We Know and What Else Should We Explore?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Photoperiod-dependent transcriptional modifications in key metabolic pathways in Coffea arabica.Tree physiology · 2021Article
- A framework of artificial light management for optimal plant development for smart greenhouse application.PloS one · 2021Article
- A simplified modelling framework facilitates more complex representations of plant circadian clocks.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The Modification of Circadian Clock Components in Soybean During Domestication and Improvement.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Deciphering the Dynamics of Interlocked Feedback Loops in a Model of the Mammalian Circadian Clock.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Waveforms of molecular oscillations reveal circadian timekeeping mechanisms.Communications biology · 2018Article
- Feedback Loops of the Mammalian Circadian Clock Constitute Repressilator.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Protein sequestration versus Hill-type repression in circadian clock models.IET systems biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A wide range of organisms features molecular machines, circadian clocks, which generate endogenous oscillations with ~24 h periodicity and thereby synchronize biological processes to diurnal environmental fluctuations. Recently, it has become clear that plants harbor more complex gene regulatory circuits within the core circadian clocks than other organisms, inspiring a fundamental question: are all these regulatory interactions between clock genes equally crucial for the establishment and maintenance of circadian rhythms? Our mechanistic simulation for Arabidopsis thaliana demonstrates that at least half of the total regulatory interactions must be present to express the circadian molecular profiles observed in wild-type plants. A set of those essential interactions is called herein a kernel of the circadian system. The kernel structure unbiasedly reveals four interlocked negative feedback loops contributing to circadian rhythms, and three feedback loops among them drive the autonomous oscillation itself. Strikingly, the kernel structure, as well as the whole clock circuitry, is overwhelmingly composed of inhibitory, rather than activating, interactions between genes. We found that this tendency underlies plant circadian molecular profiles which often exhibit sharply-shaped, cuspidate waveforms. Through the generation of these cuspidate profiles, inhibitory interactions may facilitate the global coordination of temporally-distant clock events that are markedly peaked at very specific times of day. Our systematic approach resulting in experimentally-testable predictions provides insights into a design principle of biological clockwork, with implications for synthetic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.