Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26828149›Full record

ArticleClinical nuclear medicine2016

Initial Staging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Regional Lymph Nodes: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MRI With 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Milena Cerny, Vincent Dunet, John Olivier Prior, Dieter Hahnloser, Anna Dorothea Wagner, Reto Antoine Meuli, Sabine Schmidt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nuclear medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03572595 (Diagnostic Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography With 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03572595 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography With 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F- FDG PET/CT) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled45ConditionsColo-rectal Cancer, RecurrenceArmsF-18 FDG-PET/CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Predictive value ofReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Impact of Primary Tumor and Locoregional Metastatic Lymph Node SUVMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2020
    Article
  14. The use of PET/MRI for imaging rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Milena CernyFrom the Departments of *Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; †Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging; ‡Visceral Surgery, and §Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vincent Dunet
John Olivier Prior
Dieter Hahnloser
Anna Dorothea Wagner
Reto Antoine Meuli
Sabine Schmidt
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · USSociety of Interventional Radiology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to compare diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) parameters with 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

methodsFrom October 2012 to September 2014, 24 patients with histologically confirmed and untreated LARC (T3-T4) prospectively underwent a pelvic 1.5-T DW-MRI (b = 0 s/mm, b = 600 s/mm2) and a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT, before neoadjuvant therapy. The 2 examinations were performed on the same day. Two readers measured 18F-FDG SUVmax and SUVmean of the rectal tumor and of the pathological regional lymph nodes on PET/CT and compared these with minimum and mean values of the ADC (ADCmin and ADCmean) on maps generated from DW-MRI. The diagnostic performance of ADC values in identifying pathological lymph nodes was also assessed.

resultsRegarding tumors (n = 24), we found a significant negative correlation between SUVmean and corresponding ADCmean values (ρ = -0.61, P = 0.0017) and between ADCmin and SUVmax (ρ = -0.66, P = 0.0005). Regarding the lymph nodes (n = 63), there was a significant negative correlation between ADCmean and SUVmean values (ρ = -0.38, P = 0.0021), but not between ADCmin and SUVmax values (ρ = -0.11, P = 0.41). Neither ADCmean nor ADCmin values helped distinguish pathological from benign lymph nodes (AUC of 0.24 [confidence interval, 0.10-0.38] and 0.41 [confidence interval, 0.22-0.60], respectively).

conclusionsThe correlations between ADCmean and SUVmean suggest an association between tumor cellularity and metabolic activity in untreated LARC and in regional lymph nodes. However, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, ADC values are not reliable for identifying pathological lymph nodes.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiopharmaceuticalsRectal NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID26828149
PMCPMC4851242
OpenAlexW2325506960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.