Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26827617›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2016

Social norms and financial incentives to promote employees' healthy food choices: A randomized controlled trial.

Anne N Thorndike, Jason Riis, Douglas E Levy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01604499 (Building on a Point-of-purchase Intervention to Encourage Healthy Food Choices), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01604499 nacompletednot on this map

Building on a Point-of-purchase Intervention to Encourage Healthy Food Choices

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2012 to 2013Enrolled2,672ConditionsFood LabelingArmsFeedback letters, Feedback plus incentives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Scoping Review of Choice Architecture to Promote Healthy Nutrition in Health and Care Settings.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne N ThorndikeGeneral Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: athorndike@partners.org.
Jason RiisHarvard Business School, Boston, MA, United States.
Douglas E LevyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

Assessing Be Fit, a worksite program promoting healthy weight and exerciseK23HL093221 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI THORNDIKE, ANNE N · 2009 to 2013
$785k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL093221NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL93221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePopulation-level strategies to improve healthy food choices are needed for obesity prevention. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 2672 employees at the Massachusetts General Hospital who were regular customers of the hospital cafeteria with all items labeled green (healthy), yellow (less healthy), or red (unhealthy) to determine if social norm (peer-comparison) feedback with or without financial incentives increased employees' healthy food choices.

methodsParticipants were randomized in 2012 to three arms: 1) monthly letter with social norm feedback about healthy food purchases, comparing employee to "all" and to "healthiest" customers (feedback-only); 2) monthly letter with social norm feedback plus small financial incentive for increasing green purchases (feedback-incentive); or 3) no contact (control). The main outcome was change in proportion of green-labeled purchases at the end of 3-month intervention. Post-hoc analyses examined linear trends.

resultsAt baseline, the proportion of green-labeled purchases (50%) did not differ between arms. At the end of the 3-month intervention, the percentage increase in green-labeled purchases was larger in the feedback-incentive arm compared to control (2.2% vs. 0.1%, P=0.03), but the two intervention arms were not different. The rate of increase in green-labeled purchases was higher in both feedback-only (P=0.04) and feedback-incentive arms (P=0.004) compared to control. At the end of a 3-month wash-out, there were no differences between control and intervention arms.

conclusionsSocial norms plus small financial incentives increased employees' healthy food choices over the short-term. Future research will be needed to assess the impact of this relatively low-cost intervention on employees' food choices and weight over the long-term.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov: NCT01604499.

Indexed as

MotivationSocial NormsAdolescentAdultFeedbackFemaleFood PreferencesHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalPregnancyYoung AdultFinancial incentivesFood choiceObesity preventionSocial normsWorksite

Identifiers

PMID26827617
PMCPMC4837037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.