Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26827293›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2016

A randomized clinical trial of a tailored behavioral smoking cessation preparation program.

Danielle E McCarthy, Krysten W Bold, Haruka Minami, Vivian M Yeh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The 2016 Ferno Award Address: Three Things.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle E McCarthyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey Department of Psychology, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Electronic address: demccart@rci.rutgers.edu.
Krysten W BoldRutgers, The State University of New Jersey Department of Psychology, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Electronic address: krysten.bold@yale.edu.
Haruka MinamiRutgers, The State University of New Jersey Department of Psychology, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Electronic address: hminami@fordham.edu.
Vivian M YehRutgers, The State University of New Jersey Department of Psychology, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Electronic address: vivyeh@deloitte.com.

Funding

Research Training Program in Substance Use PreventionT32DA019426 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMI P SULLIVAN · 2005 to 2026
$7.5M
Evaluation of Learning-Theory-Based Smoking Cessation StrategiesR21DA026511 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MCCARTHY, DANIELLE ERIN · 2010 to 2011
$430k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA026511-01A1NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA026511NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA019426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable progress in reducing cigarette smoking prevalence and enhancing smoking cessation treatments, most smokers who attempt to quit relapse. The current randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of an adjunctive behavioral smoking cessation treatment based on learning theory. Adult daily smokers were randomly assigned to standard treatment (N = 47) with nicotine patch and individual counseling or to standard treatment plus a "practice quitting" program involving seven sessions of escalating prescribed abstinence periods (N = 46) prior to a target stop smoking date. Practice quitting was designed to extinguish smoking in response to withdrawal symptoms. Retention in treatment was excellent and the treatment manipulation increased the interval between cigarettes across practice quitting sessions on average by 400%. The primary endpoint, seven-day point-prevalence abstinence four weeks post-quit, was not significantly affected by practice quitting (31.9% in the standard treatment condition, 37.0% in the practice quitting condition). Practice quitting increased latency to a first lapse among those who quit smoking for at least one day and prevented progression from a first lapse to relapse (smoking daily for a week) relative to standard treatment, however. Practice quitting is a promising adjunctive treatment in need of refinement to enhance adherence and efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSmokingSmoking CessationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeSurveys and QuestionnairesBehavioral treatmentRandomized clinical trialSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID26827293
PMCPMC4790439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.