ArticleEnvironment international
GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health.
Article in Environment international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 47 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 47 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Evidence-based Integration of Environmental Sustainability into Clinical Guidelines for Operating Rooms: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Silicosis and silica dust sampling in mineral mining across 30 countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Residential greenness and birth outcomes: evidence for reduced low birth weight from an umbrella review and harmonized normalized difference vegetation index synthesis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Association Between Interleukin Polymorphisms (rs4073, rs1800925, rs1179251, rs1179246, rs2227485, rs17855750, and rs153109) and Colorectal Cancer Risk.Biochemical genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Short-term and long-term effects of air pollution on acute lower respiratory infections incidence and mortality: an overview and critical appraisal of systematic reviews.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Neuroprotective Effects of Epicatechin against Oxidative Stress-Induced Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Incidence and mortality of acute aflatoxicosis: A systematic review.Environment international · 2025Pooled it
- GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.Environment international · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.Environment international · 2025Pooled it
- Prenatal PM2.5 exposure and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Association of Drug-Disease Interactions with Mortality or Readmission in Hospitalised Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Rainfall and Temperature Influences on Childhood Diarrhea and the Effect Modification Role of Water and Sanitation Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Benzene Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Quality of life after necrotizing enterocolitis: an integrative review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2024Pooled it
- Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Matter and Mortality: An Update of the WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of public health · 2024Pooled it
- The prevalence of burnout among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists pre- and post-COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Pooled it
- Serum prolactin and gonadal hormones in hemodialysis women: a meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of evidence for maternal preconception exposure to outdoor air pollution on Children's health.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2023Pooled it
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is high demand in environmental health for adoption of a structured process that evaluates and integrates evidence while making decisions and recommendations transparent. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework holds promise to address this demand. For over a decade, GRADE has been applied successfully to areas of clinical medicine, public health, and health policy, but experience with GRADE in environmental and occupational health is just beginning. Environmental and occupational health questions focus on understanding whether an exposure is a potential health hazard or risk, assessing the exposure to understand the extent and magnitude of risk, and exploring interventions to mitigate exposure or risk. Although GRADE offers many advantages, including its flexibility and methodological rigor, there are features of the different sources of evidence used in environmental and occupational health that will require further consideration to assess the need for method refinement. An issue that requires particular attention is the evaluation and integration of evidence from human, animal, in vitro, and in silico (computer modeling) studies when determining whether an environmental factor represents a potential health hazard or risk. Assessment of the hazard of exposures can produce analyses for use in the GRADE evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework to inform risk-management decisions about removing harmful exposures or mitigating risks. The EtD framework allows for grading the strength of the recommendations based on judgments of the certainty in the evidence (also known as quality of the evidence), as well as other factors that inform recommendations such as social values and preferences, resource implications, and benefits. GRADE represents an untapped opportunity for environmental and occupational health to make evidence-based recommendations in a systematic and transparent manner. The objectives of this article are to provide an overview of GRADE, discuss GRADE's applicability to environmental health, and identify priority areas for method assessment and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.