ReviewMolecular ecology2016
Detecting hybridization using ancient DNA.
Review in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Mitochondrial Genomes and Evolutionary Relationships in TwoEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Localizing Post-Admixture Adaptive Variants with Object Detection on Ancestry-Painted Chromosomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Evolutionary processes in an undescribed eucalypt: implications for the translocation of a critically endangered species.Annals of botany · 2022Article
- The untapped potential of macrofossils in ancient plant DNA research.The New phytologist · 2022Article
- The challenges of predicting transposable element activity in hybrids.Current genetics · 2021Review
- Adaptive introgression as a driver of local adaptation to climate in European white oaks.The New phytologist · 2020Article
- Adaptive Introgression: An Untapped Evolutionary Mechanism for Crop Adaptation.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- Next-generation metrics for monitoring genetic erosion within populations of conservation concern.Evolutionary applications · 2018Review
- Genome Sequencing of Ancient Plant Remains: Findings, Uses and Potential Applications for the Study and Improvement of Modern Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Article
- AD-LIBS: inferring ancestry across hybrid genomes using low-coverage sequence data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well established that related species hybridize and that this can have varied but significant effects on speciation and environmental adaptation. It should therefore come as no surprise that hybridization is not limited to species that are alive today. In the last several decades, advances in technologies for recovering and sequencing DNA from fossil remains have enabled the assembly of high-coverage genome sequences for a growing diversity of organisms, including many that are extinct. Thanks to the development of new statistical approaches for detecting and quantifying admixture from genomic data, genomes from extinct populations have proven useful both in revealing previously unknown hybridization events and informing the study of hybridization between living organisms. Here, we review some of the key recent statistical innovations for detecting ancient hybridization using genomewide sequence data and discuss how these innovations have revised our understanding of human evolutionary history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.