Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26826490›Full record

ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2016

Urinary microRNAs as potential biomarkers of pesticide exposure.

Brittany A Weldon, Sara Pacheco Shubin, Marissa N Smith, Tomomi Workman, Alexander Artemenko, William C Griffith, Beti Thompson, Elaine M Faustman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetics in neurodegenerative disorders induced by pesticides.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021
    Review
  5. Commentary: Novel strategies and new tools to curtail the health effects of pesticides.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Article
  6. miRNA regulation of social and anxiety-related behaviour.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Journal of public health research · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brittany A WeldonInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sara Pacheco ShubinInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Marissa N SmithInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Tomomi WorkmanInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Alexander ArtemenkoInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
William C GriffithInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Beti ThompsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Elaine M FaustmanInstitute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: faustman@uw.edu.

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
STUDY OF CELLULAR &MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF PESTICIDE NEURODEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITYP01ES009601 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAUSTMAN, ELAINE M · 1999 to 2013
$8.7M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800015CNICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009601NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are post-transcriptional regulators that silence messenger RNAs. Because miRNAs are stable at room temperature and long-lived, they have been proposed as molecular biomarkers to monitor disease and exposure status. While urinary miRNAs have been used clinically as potential diagnostic markers for kidney and bladder cancers and other diseases, their utility in non-clinical settings has yet to be fully developed. Our goal was to investigate the potential for urinary miRNAs to act as biomarkers of pesticide exposure and early biological response by identifying the miRNAs present in urine from 27 parent/child, farmworker/non-farmworker pairs (16FW/11NFW) collected during two agricultural seasons (thinning and post-harvest) and characterizing the between- and within-individual variability of these miRNA epigenetic regulators. MiRNAs were isolated from archived urine samples and identified using PCR arrays. Comparisons were made between age, households, season, and occupation. Of 384 miRNAs investigated, 297 (77%) were detectable in at least one sample. Seven miRNAs were detected in at least 50% of the samples, and one miRNA was present in 96% of the samples. Principal components and hierarchical clustering analyses indicate significant differences in miRNA profiles between farmworker and non-farmworker adults as well as between seasons. Six miRNAs were observed to be positively associated with farmworkers status during the post-harvest season. Expression of five of these miRNA trended towards a positive dose response relationship with organophosphate pesticide metabolites in farmworkers. These results suggest that miRNAs may be novel biomarkers of pesticide exposure and early biological response.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCluster AnalysisEnvironmental ExposureHumansLimit of DetectionMicroRNAsPesticidesBiomarkersMicroRNAsPesticidesExposure biomarkersMicroRNAOrganophosphatePesticides

Identifiers

PMID26826490
PMCPMC4963307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.