ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2016
Evolution of genetic instability in heterogeneous tumors.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell phylogenies reveal changes in the evolutionary rate within cancer and healthy tissues.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Mathematical modeling for mutator phenotype and clonal selection advantage in the risk analysis of lung cancer.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2022Article
- DNA Damage Repair and Current Therapeutic Approaches in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Tumor heterogeneity in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Acquired resistance to DZNep-mediated apoptosis is associated with copy number gains of AHCY in a B-cell lymphoma model.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicogenetic Impacts of Omeprazole: Genomic Instability and Cancer.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Review
- Mathematical modelling the pathway of genomic instability in lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Adaptive dynamics of unstable cancer populations: The canonical equation.Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
- Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018Review
- A systematic approach to cancer: evolution beyond selection.Clinical and translational medicine · 2017Article
- Coal tar pitch extract could induce chromosomal instability of human bronchial epithelial cells mediated by spindle checkpoint-related proteins.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Clonal cooperativity in heterogenous cancers.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2017Review
- Correlations between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Genetic Instability in Cancer Patients-A Clinical Perspective Study.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- Stochastic multi-scale models of competition within heterogeneous cellular populations: Simulation methods and mean-field analysis.Journal of theoretical biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic instability is an important characteristic of cancer. While most cancers develop genetic instability at some stage of their progression, sometimes a temporary rise of instability is followed by the return to a relatively stable genome. Neither the reasons for these dynamics, nor, more generally, the role of instability in tumor progression, are well understood. In this paper we develop a class of mathematical models to study the evolutionary competition dynamics among different sub-populations in a heterogeneous tumor. We observe that despite the complexity of this multi-component and multi-process system, there is only a small number of scenarios expected in the context of the evolution of instability. If the penalty incurred by unstable cells (the decrease in the growth due to deleterious mutations) is high compared with the gain (the production rate of advantageous mutations), then instability does not evolve. In the opposite case, instability evolves and comes to dominate the system. In the intermediate parameter regime, instability is generated but later gives way to stable clones. Moreover, the model also informs us of the patterns of instability for cancer lineages corresponding to different stages of progression. It is predicted that mutations causing instability are merely "passengers" in tumors that have undergone only a small number of malignant mutations. Further down the path of carcinogenesis, however, unstable cells are more likely to give rise to the winning clonal wave that takes over the tumor and carries the evolution forward, thus conferring a causal role of the instability in such cases. Further, each individual clonal wave (i.e. cells harboring a fixed number of malignant driver mutations) experiences its own evolutionary history. It can fall under one of three types of temporal behavior: stable throughout, unstable to stable, or unstable throughout. Which scenario is realized depends on the subtle (but predictable) interplay among mutation rates and the death toll associated with the instability. The modeling approach provided here sheds light onto important aspects of the evolutionary dynamics of instability, which may be relevant to treatment scenarios that target instability or damage repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.