ArticleBMJ open2016
Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shadow study: randomized comparison of clinic with video follow-up in glioma undergoing adjuvant temozolomide therapy.CNS oncology · 2018Trial
- Article
- SCOPE and FRAME: Context-Specific Tools for Virtual Care Service Delivery in Rural and Remote Communities.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Dietitian reflections on video consultations: a descriptive qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Technology and the clinical encounter: a qualitative study of mental health clinician and patient experiences of telemedicine.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- [Ethical and conceptual considerations in telemedicine: A necessary reflection].Atencion primaria · 2026Article
- Exploring Benefits of and Barriers to Patient Involvement Through Digital Tools in Psycho-Oncology: Qualitative Study Within the Reduct Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- A qualitative study on blood and marrow transplant recipients' perceptions of health professional roles following BMT and preferences for ongoing care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Telemedicine Adoption for Managing Chronic and Rare Diseases in Indonesia During and Beyond the COVID-19 Era: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Optimizing Cooperative Community Hospital Selection for Post-Discharge Care with NSGA-II Algorithm.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patient and clinician perspectives on test result communication in dermatology.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Situated generosity in clinical care: A mixed-methods study of STI services in China.PloS one · 2026Article
- Metaverse in surgery - origins and future potential.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- GP characteristics and video use in out-of-hours primary care: a register-based study.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Patient Outcomes and Healthcare Accessibility via Telemedicine in Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Experiences of patients with complex needs at municipal emergency outpost satellites.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Experiences of a remote, person-centred intervention in older persons living with frailty - a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Clinical Pathways in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: Narrative Review on Sustainability, Quality, and Resource Management.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2025Review
- A Pragmatic Tele-Nursing Program Improves Satisfaction of Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis and Their Caregivers-A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRemote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations.
methodsTo explore the advantages and limitations of video consultations, we will conduct in-depth qualitative studies of real consultations (microlevel) embedded in an organisational case study (mesolevel), taking account of national context (macrolevel). The study is based in 2 contrasting clinical settings (diabetes and cancer) in a National Health Service (NHS) acute trust in London, UK. Main data sources are: microlevel--audio, video and screen capture to produce rich multimodal data on 45 remote consultations; mesolevel--interviews, ethnographic observations and analysis of documents within the trust; macrolevel--key informant interviews of national-level stakeholders and document analysis. Data will be analysed and synthesised using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory. ETHICS APPROVAL: City Road and Hampstead NHS Research Ethics Committee, 9 December 2014, reference 14/LO/1883. PLANNED OUTPUTS: We plan outputs for 5 main audiences: (1) academics: research publications and conference presentations; (2) service providers: standard operating procedures, provisional operational guidance and key safety issues; (3) professional bodies and defence societies: summary of relevant findings to inform guidance to members; (4) policymakers: summary of key findings; (5) patients and carers: 'what to expect in your virtual consultation'. DISCUSSION: The research literature on video consultations is sparse. Such consultations offer potential advantages to patients (who are spared the cost and inconvenience of travel) and the healthcare system (eg, they may be more cost-effective), but fears have been expressed that they may be clinically risky and/or less acceptable to patients or staff, and they bring significant technical, logistical and regulatory challenges. We anticipate that this study will contribute to a balanced assessment of when, how and in what circumstances this model might be introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.