Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26826054›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2016

A brief motivational interview with action and coping planning components enhances motivational autonomy among volunteer blood donors.

Christopher R France, Janis L France, Bruce W Carlson, Debra A Kessler, Mark Rebosa, Beth H Shaz, Katrala Madden, Patricia M Carey, Kristen R Fox, Irina E Livitz and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Janis L FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Bruce W CarlsonDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Debra A KesslerNew York Blood Center, New York, New York.
Mark RebosaNew York Blood Center, New York, New York.
Beth H ShazNew York Blood Center, New York, New York.
Katrala MaddenHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Patricia M CareyHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Kristen R FoxDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Irina E LivitzDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Brett AnkawiDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
P Maxwell SlepianDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Ohio University · USNew York Blood Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Motivating Type O- Blood Donors to ReturnR56HL119180 · NHLBI · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANCE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2014 to 2014
$665k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL119180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contrast to standard donor retention strategies (e.g., mailings, phone calls, text messages), we developed a brief telephone interview, based on motivational interviewing principles, that encourages blood donors to reflect upon their unique motivators and barriers for giving. This study examined the effect of this motivational interview, combined with action and coping plan components, on blood donor motivations. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThe design was to randomly assign blood donors to receive either a telephone-delivered motivational interview with action and coping plan components or a control call approximately 6 weeks after their most recent donation. Participants completed a series of surveys related to donation motivation approximately 3 weeks before telephone contact (precall baseline) and then repeated these surveys approximately 1 week after telephone contact (postcall).

resultsThe sample was 63% female, included a majority (52.6%) of first-time blood donors, and had a mean age of 30.0 years (SD, 11.7 years). A series of analyses of variance revealed that, relative to controls (n = 244), donors in the motivational interview group (n = 254) had significantly larger increases in motivational autonomy (p = 0.001), affective attitude (p = 0.004), self-efficacy (p = 0.03), anticipated regret (p = 0.001), and intention (p = < 0.001), as well as larger decreases in donation anxiety (p = 0.01), from precall baseline to postcall assessment.

conclusionThis study supports motivational interviewing with action and coping planning as a novel strategy to promote key contributors to donor motivation.

Indexed as

Interview, PsychologicalMotivationAdolescentAdultAttitudeBlood DonorsEmotionsFemaleHumansIntentionMaleSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneVolunteersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26826054
PMCPMC5253229
OpenAlexW2430957676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.