Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26825952›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2016

Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xavier Monnet, Paul Marik, Jean-Louis Teboul

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 195 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
39.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03144349 unknown statusnot on this map

Is Variation of Plasmatic Protein Concentration During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Predictive of Hypovolemia in Intensive Care Unit?

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHopital Louis PradelRan2016 to 2019Enrolled52ConditionsContinuous Renal Replacement Therapy, Intensive Care Unit, Hypovolemia, Fluid Overload
NCT03225378 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Changes in Pulse Pressure Variations Induced by Passive Leg Raising Test to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in ICU

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCentre Hospitalier ArrasRan2017 to 2021Enrolled286ConditionsAcute Circulatory FailureArmsFluid loading of 500 mL of crystalloid solution, Passive Leg Raising test
NCT05211765 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Association of Respiratory Variation of Superior Vena Cava in Transthoracic View and Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ChileRan2021 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsShockArmsSuperior vena cava transthoracic evaluation
NCT05557461 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Patients, Can End-tidal co2 Measurement Help?, a Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBozyaka Training and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsSeptic Shock, Hypovolemia, SepsisArmsEnd-tifdal co2, systolic, diastolic blood pressure, ppv values and vci distensibility
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 481 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. The haemodynamic dilemma in emergency care: Is fluid responsiveness the answer? A systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  12. Guideline
  13. A randomized controlled trial of passive leg raise to facilitate pediatric peripheral intravenous access.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Do ScvOPhysiological reports · 2021
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xavier MonnetService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, 78, Rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. xavier.monnet@bct.aphp.fr.
Paul MarikDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Jean-Louis TeboulService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, 78, Rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Bicêtre Hospital · FREastern Virginia Medical School · USInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the passive leg raising (PLR)-induced changes in cardiac output (CO) and in arterial pulse pressure (PP) as predictors of fluid responsiveness in adults.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database were screened for relevant original and review articles. The meta-analysis determined the pooled area under the ROC curve, the sensitivity, specificity and threshold for the PLR test when assessed with CO and PP.

resultsTwenty-one studies (991 adult patients, 995 fluid challenges) were included. CO was measured by echocardiography in six studies, calibrated pulse contour analysis in six studies, bioreactance in four studies, oesophageal Doppler in three studies, transpulmonary thermodilution or pulmonary artery catheter in one study and suprasternal Doppler in one study. The pooled correlation between the PLR-induced and the fluid-induced changes in CO was 0.76 (0.73-0.80). For the PLR-induced changes in CO, the pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (0.81-0.88) and the pooled specificity was 0.91 (0.88-0.93). The area under the ROC curve was 0.95 ± 0.01. The best threshold was a PLR-induced increase in CO ≥10 ± 2 %. For the PLR-induced changes in PP (8 studies, 432 fluid challenges), the pooled sensitivity was 0.56 (0.49-0.53), the pooled specificity was 0.83 (0.77-0.88) and the pooled area under the ROC curve was 0.77 ± 0.05. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were consistent with the primary analysis.

conclusionsPLR-induced changes in CO very reliably predict the response of CO to volume expansion in adults with acute circulatory failure. When PLR effects are assessed by changes in PP, the specificity of the PLR test remains acceptable but its sensitivity is poor.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyPatient PositioningCardiac OutputChi-Square DistributionCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsLegMonitoring, PhysiologicROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityFluid responsivenessMeta-analysisPassive leg raisingVolume expansion

Identifiers

PMID26825952
OpenAlexW2260276881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.