Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26825819›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2016

Effect of biosurfactants on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a BioFlux channel.

M A Diaz De Rienzo, P S Stevenson, R Marchant, I M Banat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Lactonic sophorolipids byRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Rhamnolipid 89 Biosurfactant Is Effective againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Biofilm Formation by Pathogenic Bacteria: Applying aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Rhamnolipid exhibits anti-biofilm activity against the dermatophytic fungiBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M A Diaz De RienzoSchool of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
P S StevensonUnilever Research and Development Laboratory, Port Sunlight, Wirral, CH62 4ZD, UK.
R MarchantSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK.
I M BanatSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK. IM.Banat@ulster.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated that biosurfactants play a role both in maintaining channels between multicellular structures in biofilms and in dispersal of cells from biofilms. A combination of caprylic acid (0.01 % v/v) together with rhamnolipids (0.04 % v/v) was applied to biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 9144 and a mixed culture under BioFlux flowthrough conditions and caused disruption of the biofilms. The biofilms were also treated with a combination of rhamnolipids (0.04 % v/v) and sophorolipids (0.01 %). Control treatments with PBS 1× had no apparent effect on biofilm disruption. The Gram-positive bacterium (S. aureus ATCC 9144) was more sensitive than P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 in terms of disruption and viability as shown by Live/Dead staining. Disruption of biofilms of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 was minimal. Oxygen consumption by biofilms, after different treatments with biosurfactants, confirms that sophorolipid on its own is unable to kill/inhibit cells of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442, and even when used in combination with rhamnolipids, under static conditions, no decrease in the cell viability was observed. Cells in biofilms exposed to mono-rhamnolipids (0.04 % v/v) showed behaviour typical of exposure to bacteriostatic compounds, but when exposed to di-rhamnolipids (0.04 % v/v), they displayed a pattern characteristic of bactericidal compounds.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCaprylatesGlycolipidsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusSurface-Active AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCaprylatesGlycolipidsoctanoic acidrhamnolipidSurface-Active AgentsBiofilmsBioFluxBiosurfactantsRhamnolipids

Identifiers

PMID26825819
PMCPMC4909806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.