ArticleQualitative health research2017
Urban-Dwelling Community Members' Views on Biomedical Research Engagement.
Article in Qualitative health research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Community leaders' perceptions of pain and research engagement: Implications for participant diversity and inclusion in pain clinical trials.The journal of pain · 2025Article
- Mixed-Methods Approach: Impact of Clinical Consenter Diversity on Clinical Trials Enrollment.Cancers · 2025Article
- Respectful closure of a CEnR DNA integrity study: A bridge to sustained interactions with research participants.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned in Clinical Research Recruitment of Midlife Latinas During COVID-19.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Improving community participation in clinical and translational research: CTSA Sentinel Network proof of concept study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how?Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice · 2019Article
- Learning and Action in Community Health: Using the Health Belief Model to Assess and Educate African American Community Residents about Participation in Clinical Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Predictors of Participation in Clinical Research.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we explore community members' overall understanding and experience with biomedical research engagement. We conducted a qualitative analysis to explore a concept that emerged but was not specifically addressed in a pre-existing dataset obtained using four focus group sessions with 30 urban-dwelling community members. Transcripts were read in an iterative process, and an emergent content analysis was performed. Five main themes were identified: (a) engaging in research to contribute to personal or greater good, (b) hierarchy of trust, (c) the importance of disclosure and transparency, (d) practical barriers to research engagement, and (e) fear of research procedures. Community members view research engagement as a collaborative process whereby community members and researchers are involved in all stages of the investigation. Focusing on research engagement, and not merely participation, may enhance community knowledge of the research process and advance scientific knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.