Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26825020›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2016

The BestFIT trial: A SMART approach to developing individualized weight loss treatments.

Nancy E Sherwood, Meghan L Butryn, Evan M Forman, Daniel Almirall, Elisabeth M Seburg, A Lauren Crain, Alicia S Kunin-Batson, Marcia G Hayes, Rona L Levy, Robert W Jeffery

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02368002 (Evaluating Options for Non-Responders), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02368002 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating Options for Non-Responders: A SMART Approach to Enhancing Weight Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthPartners InstituteRan2015 to 2019Enrolled468ConditionsObesityArmsBehavioral weight loss therapy, Portion-controlled meals, Acceptance-based treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy E SherwoodHealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave. S., Mail stop 21111R, PO Box 1524, Bloomington, MN 55440-1524, United States. Electronic address: Nancy.E.Sherwood@HealthPartners.com.
Meghan L ButrynDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Evan M FormanDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Daniel AlmirallInstitute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, PO Box 1248, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106, United States.
Elisabeth M SeburgHealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave. S., Mail stop 21111R, PO Box 1524, Bloomington, MN 55440-1524, United States.
A Lauren CrainHealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave. S., Mail stop 21111R, PO Box 1524, Bloomington, MN 55440-1524, United States.
Alicia S Kunin-BatsonHealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave. S., Mail stop 21111R, PO Box 1524, Bloomington, MN 55440-1524, United States.
Marcia G HayesHealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave. S., Mail stop 21111R, PO Box 1524, Bloomington, MN 55440-1524, United States.
Rona L LevySchool of Social Work, University of Washington, 4101 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98105-6299, United States.
Robert W JefferyDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, West Bank Office Building, 1300 South 2nd St, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States.
HealthPartners · USDrexel University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Obesity and Energy Metabolism CoreP30DK050456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BERNLOHR, DAVID A · 1995 to 2015
$17.0M
Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LI, RUNZE · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Novel Methods for Intensive Longitudinal Data in SMART Studies of Drug Abuse and HIVR01DA039901 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALMIRALL, DANIEL, NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
Evaluating Options for Non-Responders: A SMART Approach to Enhancing Weight LossR01CA188892 · NCI · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI CRAIN, A LAUREN, SHERWOOD, NANCY E. · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA188892NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188892NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039901NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral weight loss programs help people achieve clinically meaningful weight losses (8-10% of starting body weight). Despite data showing that only half of participants achieve this goal, a "one size fits all" approach is normative. This weight loss intervention science gap calls for adaptive interventions that provide the "right treatment at the right time for the right person." Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMART), use experimental design principles to answer questions for building adaptive interventions including whether, how, or when to alter treatment intensity, type, or delivery. This paper describes the rationale and design of the BestFIT study, a SMART designed to evaluate the optimal timing for intervening with sub-optimal responders to weight loss treatment and relative efficacy of two treatments that address self-regulation challenges which impede weight loss: 1) augmenting treatment with portion-controlled meals (PCM) which decrease the need for self-regulation; and 2) switching to acceptance-based behavior treatment (ABT) which boosts capacity for self-regulation. The primary aim is to evaluate the benefit of changing treatment with PCM versus ABT. The secondary aim is to evaluate the best time to intervene with sub-optimal responders. BestFIT results will lead to the empirically-supported construction of an adaptive intervention that will optimize weight loss outcomes and associated health benefits.

Indexed as

AdultAgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityResearch DesignSelf CareSelf-ControlTreatment OutcomeWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultsObesityTreatmentWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID26825020
PMCPMC4941634
OpenAlexW2267171457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.