ArticlePloS one2016
Genomic Prediction of Testcross Performance in Canola (Brassica napus).
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Harnessing genomic prediction in Brassica napus through a nested association mapping population.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Review of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in crop research.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Review
- Review
- Diversity of Phytosterols in Leaves of Wild Brassicaceae Species as Compared toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genomic prediction of hybrid performance for agronomic traits in sorghum.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Haplotype blocks for genomic prediction: a comparative evaluation in multiple crop datasets.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Accurate prediction of quantitative traits with failed SNP calls in canola and maize.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A genome-wide association study and genomic prediction forFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Applied to the Search for Nonlinear Features in Breeding Populations.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Genomic Selection: A Tool for Accelerating the Efficiency of Molecular Breeding for Development of Climate-Resilient Crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- The application of pangenomics and machine learning in genomic selection in plants.The plant genome · 2021Article
- The Bnapus50K array: a quick and versatile genotyping tool for Brassica napus genomic breeding and research.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Exploring the gene pool of Brassica napus by genomics-based approaches.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Modeling first order additive × additive epistasis improves accuracy of genomic prediction for sclerotinia stem rot resistance in canola.The plant genome · 2021Article
- Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Genomic prediction and genomic heritability of grain yield and its related traits in a safflower genebank collection.The plant genome · 2021Article
- Association genetics of the parameters related to nitrogen use efficiency in Brassica juncea L.Plant molecular biology · 2021Article
- Genomics Armed With Diversity Leads the Way inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a modern breeding approach where genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker profiles are simultaneously used to estimate performance of untested genotypes. In this study, the potential of genomic selection methods to predict testcross performance for hybrid canola breeding was applied for various agronomic traits based on genome-wide marker profiles. A total of 475 genetically diverse spring-type canola pollinator lines were genotyped at 24,403 single-copy, genome-wide SNP loci. In parallel, the 950 F1 testcross combinations between the pollinators and two representative testers were evaluated for a number of important agronomic traits including seedling emergence, days to flowering, lodging, oil yield and seed yield along with essential seed quality characters including seed oil content and seed glucosinolate content. A ridge-regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) model was applied in combination with 500 cross-validations for each trait to predict testcross performance, both across the whole population as well as within individual subpopulations or clusters, based solely on SNP profiles. Subpopulations were determined using multidimensional scaling and K-means clustering. Genomic prediction accuracy across the whole population was highest for seed oil content (0.81) followed by oil yield (0.75) and lowest for seedling emergence (0.29). For seed yieId, seed glucosinolate, lodging resistance and days to onset of flowering (DTF), prediction accuracies were 0.45, 0.61, 0.39 and 0.56, respectively. Prediction accuracies could be increased for some traits by treating subpopulations separately; a strategy which only led to moderate improvements for some traits with low heritability, like seedling emergence. No useful or consistent increase in accuracy was obtained by inclusion of a population substructure covariate in the model. Testcross performance prediction using genome-wide SNP markers shows considerable potential for pre-selection of promising hybrid combinations prior to resource-intensive field testing over multiple locations and years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.