Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26824897›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Novel High-Throughput Method for Molecular Detection of Human Pathogenic Viruses Using a Nanofluidic Real-Time PCR System.

Coralie Coudray-Meunier, Audrey Fraisse, Sandra Martin-Latil, Sabine Delannoy, Patrick Fach, Sylvie Perelle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Porcine astrovirus: a review.Archives of virology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Coralie Coudray-MeunierUniversité Paris-Est, ANSES, Food Safety Laboratory, Enteric viruses Unit, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Audrey FraisseUniversité Paris-Est, ANSES, Food Safety Laboratory, Enteric viruses Unit, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Sandra Martin-LatilUniversité Paris-Est, ANSES, Food Safety Laboratory, Enteric viruses Unit, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Sabine DelannoyUniversité Paris-Est, ANSES, Food Safety Laboratory, Identypath, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Patrick FachUniversité Paris-Est, ANSES, Food Safety Laboratory, Identypath, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Sylvie PerelleUniversité Paris-Est, ANSES, Food Safety Laboratory, Enteric viruses Unit, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human enteric viruses are recognized as the main causes of food- and waterborne diseases worldwide. Sensitive and quantitative detection of human enteric viruses is typically achieved through quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). A nanofluidic real-time PCR system was used to develop novel high-throughput methods for qualitative molecular detection (RT-qPCR array) and quantification of human pathogenic viruses by digital RT-PCR (RT-dPCR). The performance of high-throughput PCR methods was investigated for detecting 19 human pathogenic viruses and two main process controls used in food virology. The conventional real-time PCR system was compared to the RT-dPCR and RT-qPCR array. Based on the number of genome copies calculated by spectrophotometry, sensitivity was found to be slightly better with RT-qPCR than with RT-dPCR for 14 viruses by a factor range of from 0.3 to 1.6 log10. Conversely, sensitivity was better with RT-dPCR than with RT-qPCR for seven viruses by a factor range of from 0.10 to 1.40 log10. Interestingly, the number of genome copies determined by RT-dPCR was always from 1 to 2 log10 lower than the expected copy number calculated by RT-qPCR standard curve. The sensitivity of the RT-qPCR and RT-qPCR array assays was found to be similar for two viruses, and better with RT-qPCR than with RT-qPCR array for eighteen viruses by a factor range of from 0.7 to 3.0 log10. Conversely, sensitivity was only 0.30 log10 better with the RT-qPCR array than with conventional RT-qPCR assays for norovirus GIV detection. Finally, the RT-qPCR array and RT-dPCR assays were successfully used together to screen clinical samples and quantify pathogenic viruses. Additionally, this method made it possible to identify co-infection in clinical samples. In conclusion, given the rapidity and potential for large numbers of viral targets, this nanofluidic RT-qPCR assay should have a major impact on human pathogenic virus surveillance and outbreak investigations and is likely to be of benefit to public health.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesAdenoviridaeBocavirusDNA PrimersEnterovirusHepatitis A virusHepatitis E virusHumansKobuvirusMamastrovirusMengovirusNanostructuresNorovirusParvovirusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRotavirusDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID26824897
PMCPMC4732599
OpenAlexW2262987799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.