Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26824611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Development and Validation of the Indian Family Violence and Control Scale.

Ameeta S Kalokhe, Rob Stephenson, Mary E Kelley, Kristin L Dunkle, Anuradha Paranjape, Vikram Solas, Latika Karve, Carlos del Rio, Seema Sahay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Community-Based Intimate Partner Violence Interventions in India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ameeta S KalokheEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Rob StephensonUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Mary E KelleyEmory University Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kristin L DunkleSouth African Medical Research Council, Gender and Health Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa.
Anuradha ParanjapeTemple University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Vikram SolasDepartment of Social & Behavioral Research, National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Latika KarveDepartment of Social & Behavioral Research, National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Carlos del RioEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Seema SahayDepartment of Social & Behavioral Research, National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Emory University · USNational AIDS Research Institute · INSouth African Medical Research Council · ZATemple University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Vanderbilt-Emory-Cornell-Duke Consortium for Global Health Fellows (VECDor)R25TW009337 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT, VERMUND, STEN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
Primary prevention of intimate partner violence in IndiaK01TW009664 · FIC · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KALOKHE, AMEETA SHIVDAS · 2013 to 2017
$660k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW009664FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high prevalence of domestic violence (DV) among married women in India and associated negative health repercussions highlight the need for effective prevention strategies and tools to measure the efficacy of such interventions. Literature supporting differing manifestations of DV by culture underscores the need for a culturally-tailored scale to more effectively measure DV in the Indian context. We therefore aimed to develop and validate such a tool, the Indian Family Violence and Control Scale (IFVCS), through a mixed-methods study. The psychometric development of IFVCS is herein discussed. After field pre-testing and expert review, a 63-item questionnaire was administered to a random sample of 630 married women from May-July 2013 in Pune, India. The item response theory approach for binary data to explore the IFVCS structure suggested that IFVCS is reliable, with the majority of items having high (>0.5) and significant factor loadings. Concurrent validity, assessed by comparing responses to IFVCS with the validated, abridged Conflict Tactics Scale-2, was high (r = 0.899, p<0.001) as was the construct validity, demonstrated by its significant association with several established DV correlates. Therefore, initial assessment of the IFVCS psychometric properties suggests that it is an effective tool for measuring DV among married women in India and speaks to its capacity for enhancing understanding of DV epidemiology and for evaluating the effectiveness of future DV interventions.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMarriageMiddle AgedPsychometricsRisk FactorsSpouses

Identifiers

PMID26824611
PMCPMC4732749
OpenAlexW2271104528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.