ArticlePloS one2016
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back; Xeno-MicroRNAs Reported in Breast Milk Are Artifacts.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Apple a Day? The Hypothesis of Cross-Kingdom Gene Regulation by Plant miRNAs in Mammals and Its Controversies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Conundrum of XenomiRs and Human Health.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Review
- Role of Exosomal MicroRNAs in Cell-to-Cell Communication.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Safety Considerations for Humans and Other Vertebrates Regarding Agricultural Uses of Externally Applied RNA Molecules.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma.F1000Research · 2018Article
- Article
- Detection of Plant miRNAs Abundance in Human Breast Milk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Potential relevance of microRNAs in inter-species epigenetic communication, and implications for disease pathogenesis.RNA biology · 2017Review
- MicroRNA categorization using sequence motifs and k-mers.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Exo-miRExplorer: A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring and Comparatively Analyzing Exogenous MicroRNAs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Formidable challenges to the notion of biologically important roles for dietary small RNAs in ingesting mammals.Genes & nutrition · 2017Review
- Bioavailability of transgenic microRNAs in genetically modified plants.Genes & nutrition · 2017Article
- Diet-derived microRNAs: unicorn or silver bullet?Genes & nutrition · 2017Article
- The impact of feature selection on one and two-class classification performance for plant microRNAs.PeerJ · 2016Article
- Uptake of dietary milk miRNAs by adult humans: a validation study.F1000Research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short RNA sequences that guide post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression via complementarity to their target mRNAs. Discovered only recently, miRNAs have drawn a lot of attention. Multiple protein complexes interact to first cleave a hairpin from nascent RNA, export it into the cytosol, trim its loop, and incorporate it into the RISC complex which is important for binding its target mRNA. This process works within one cell, but circulating miRNAs have been described suggesting a role in cell-cell communication. MOTIVATION: Viruses and intracellular parasites like Toxoplasma gondii use miRNAs to manipulate host gene expression from within the cellular environment. However, recent research has claimed that a rice miRNA may regulate human gene expression. Despite ongoing debates about these findings and general reluctance to accept them, a recent report claimed that foodborne plant miRNAs pass through the digestive tract, travel through blood to be incorporated by alveolar cells excreting milk. The miRNAs are then said to have some immune-related function in the newborn. PRINCIPAL
findingsWe acquired the data that supports their claim and performed further analyses. In addition to the reported miRNAs, we were able to detect almost complete mRNAs and found that the foreign RNA expression profiles among samples are exceedingly similar. Inspecting the source of the data helped understand how RNAs could contaminate the samples.
conclusionViewing these findings in context with the difficulties foreign RNAs face on their route into breast milk and the fact that many identified foodborne miRNAs are not from actual food sources, we can conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the original claims and evidence presented may be due to artifacts. We report that the study claiming their existence is more likely to have detected RNA contamination than miRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.