ArticlePloS one2016
A New Immunoassay for Detecting All Subtypes of Shiga Toxins Produced by Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli in Ground Beef.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- DISCO-LAMP: a novel discontinuous LAMP assay for isothermal antigen detection.Sensors & diagnostics · 2026Article
- Development of an impedimetric aptasensor for Shiga-like toxin 1 using a DNA aptamer and an interdigitated microelectrode.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of ELISA Using Phage-Displayed Stx2 Mini-Body for Detection of STEC Antigen in Field Farming Pig Samples.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of a Rapid and Sensitive CANARY Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Shiga Toxin 2 fromToxins · 2024Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Development of Thermally Stable Nanobodies for Detection and Neutralization of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B.Toxins · 2023Article
- Recent Advancements in Technologies to Detect EnterohaemorrhagicJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- Genome Sequence Analysis and Characterization of Shiga Toxin 2 Production byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Rapid and quantitative detection of Shiga toxin1 and Shiga toxin2 based on multiple targets UPT-LF assay.Engineering in life sciences · 2020Article
- Rapid and Label-Free Immunosensing of Shiga Toxin Subtypes with Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging.Toxins · 2020Article
- Structural and Functional Characterization of Stx2k, a New Subtype of Shiga Toxin 2.Microorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShiga toxin (Stx) is a common virulence factor of all Shiga toxin producing E. coli (STEC) that cause a wide spectrum of disease, including hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Although several commercial kits are available for detection of Stx produced by STEC, none of them are capable of recognizing all subtypes of Stxs, which include three subtypes of Stx1 and seven subtypes of Stx2. METHODS AND
findingsNew monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against Stx1 and Stx2 were developed. A universal sandwich ELISA capable of detecting all known subtypes of Stx1 and Stx2 was established using a pool of newly developed antibodies. To precisely monitor the sensitivity of the assay for each subtype of Stxs, recombinant toxoids were created and used as standards in ELISAs. Because of the high affinity of the antibodies incorporated, the ELISA assay is highly sensitive with a limit of detection for the different subtypes of Stx1a and Stx2a between 10 and 50 pg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The assay was also able to identify STEC based on the production of Stxs using the supernatants of culture fluids or even single colonies on agar plates without lengthy enrichment in liquid medium. When applied to ground beef samples, this newly developed ELISA was capable of distinguishing beef samples spiked with a single bacterial cell.
conclusionsA highly sensitive and universal assay for all subtypes of Stx1 and Stx2 was developed. It has significantly improved upon the current technologies by avoiding false negative results due to the narrow detection range of the assay. The assay developed in this study can be useful for prompt detection of new and emerging serotypes and screening ground beef samples for contamination of STEC at an early stage in the food supply chain, thus avoiding the need for possible recall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.