Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26824247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A New Immunoassay for Detecting All Subtypes of Shiga Toxins Produced by Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli in Ground Beef.

Xiaohua He, Qiulian Kong, Stephanie Patfield, Craig Skinner, Reuven Rasooly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent Advancements in Technologies to Detect EnterohaemorrhagicJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Genome Sequence Analysis and Characterization of Shiga Toxin 2 Production byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaohua HeWestern Regional Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, California, United States of America.
Qiulian KongShanghai Shuneng Irradiation Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Stephanie PatfieldWestern Regional Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, California, United States of America.
Craig SkinnerWestern Regional Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, California, United States of America.
Reuven RasoolyWestern Regional Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, California, United States of America.
Western Regional Research Center · USAgricultural Research Service · USShanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShiga toxin (Stx) is a common virulence factor of all Shiga toxin producing E. coli (STEC) that cause a wide spectrum of disease, including hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Although several commercial kits are available for detection of Stx produced by STEC, none of them are capable of recognizing all subtypes of Stxs, which include three subtypes of Stx1 and seven subtypes of Stx2. METHODS AND

findingsNew monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against Stx1 and Stx2 were developed. A universal sandwich ELISA capable of detecting all known subtypes of Stx1 and Stx2 was established using a pool of newly developed antibodies. To precisely monitor the sensitivity of the assay for each subtype of Stxs, recombinant toxoids were created and used as standards in ELISAs. Because of the high affinity of the antibodies incorporated, the ELISA assay is highly sensitive with a limit of detection for the different subtypes of Stx1a and Stx2a between 10 and 50 pg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The assay was also able to identify STEC based on the production of Stxs using the supernatants of culture fluids or even single colonies on agar plates without lengthy enrichment in liquid medium. When applied to ground beef samples, this newly developed ELISA was capable of distinguishing beef samples spiked with a single bacterial cell.

conclusionsA highly sensitive and universal assay for all subtypes of Stx1 and Stx2 was developed. It has significantly improved upon the current technologies by avoiding false negative results due to the narrow detection range of the assay. The assay developed in this study can be useful for prompt detection of new and emerging serotypes and screening ground beef samples for contamination of STEC at an early stage in the food supply chain, thus avoiding the need for possible recall.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody AffinityAntibody SpecificityCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLimit of DetectionMeatMiceProtein BindingRecombinant ProteinsShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2Antibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalRecombinant ProteinsShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2

Identifiers

PMID26824247
PMCPMC4732753
OpenAlexW2252762950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.