Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26824211›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2015

Musical training software for children with cochlear implants.

W Di Nardo, L Schinaia, R Anzivino, E De Corso, A Ciacciarelli, G Paludetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05950412 (Relationship Between Pitch Discrimination, Music Abilities and Emotional Speech Perception in School Aged Children With Cochlear Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05950412 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Relationship Between Pitch Discrimination, Music Abilities and Emotional Speech Perception in School Aged Children With Cochlear Implant

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2023 to 2024Enrolled37ConditionsHearing Loss, Sensorineural
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. New trends in rehabilitation of children with ENT disorders.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

W Di NardoInstitute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
L SchinaiaInstitute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
R AnzivinoInstitute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
E De CorsoInstitute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
A CiacciarelliInstitute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
G PaludettiInstitute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the voice in a free field has an excellent recruitment by a cochlear implant (CI), the situation is different for music because it is a much more complex process, where perceiving the pitch discrimination becomes important to appreciate it. The aim of this study is to determine the music perception abilities among children with Cis and to verify the benefit of a training period for specific musical frequency discrimination. Our main goals were to prepare a computer tool for pitch discrimination training and to assess musical improvements. Ten children, aged between 5 and 12 years, with optimal phoneme recognition in quiet and with no disabilities associated with deafness, were selected to join the training. Each patient received, before training period, two types of exams: a pitch discrimination test, consisting of discovering if two notes were different or not; and a music test consisting of two identification tasks (melodic and full version) of one music-item among 5 popular childhood songs. After assessment, a music training software was designed and utilised individually at home for a period of six months. The results following complete training showed significantly higher performance in the task of frequency discrimination. After a proper musical training identification, frequency discrimination performance was significantly higher (p < 0.001). The same considerations can be made in the identification of the songs presented in their melodic (p = 0.0151) and full songs version (p = 0.0071). Cases where children did not reach the most difficult level may be due to insufficient time devoted to training (ideal time estimated at 2-3 hours per week). In conclusion, this study shows that is possible to assess musical enhancement and to achieve improvements in frequency discrimination, following pitch discrimination training.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsMusicPitch PerceptionChildCochlear ImplantationFemaleHumansMaleSoftwareChildrenCochlear implantsMusic perceptionMusic Test batterySpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID26824211
PMCPMC4731893
OpenAlexW1880506480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.