Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26824177›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2016

Genomic reconstruction of a novel, deeply branched sediment archaeal phylum with pathways for acetogenesis and sulfur reduction.

Kiley W Seitz, Cassandre S Lazar, Kai-Uwe Hinrichs, Andreas P Teske, Brett J Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The archaeal roots of eukaryotic life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The dynamic history of prokaryotic phyla: discovery, diversity and division.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kiley W SeitzDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA.
Cassandre S LazarDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kai-Uwe HinrichsMARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Andreas P TeskeDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Brett J BakerDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

European Research Council 247153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine and estuary sediments contain a variety of uncultured archaea whose metabolic and ecological roles are unknown. De novo assembly and binning of high-throughput metagenomic sequences from the sulfate-methane transition zone in estuary sediments resulted in the reconstruction of three partial to near-complete (2.4-3.9 Mb) genomes belonging to a previously unrecognized archaeal group. Phylogenetic analyses of ribosomal RNA genes and ribosomal proteins revealed that this group is distinct from any previously characterized archaea. For this group, found in the White Oak River estuary, and previously registered in sedimentary samples, we propose the name 'Thorarchaeota'. The Thorarchaeota appear to be capable of acetate production from the degradation of proteins. Interestingly, they also have elemental sulfur and thiosulfate reduction genes suggesting they have an important role in intermediate sulfur cycling. The reconstruction of these genomes from a deeply branched, widespread group expands our understanding of sediment biogeochemistry and the evolutionary history of Archaea.

Indexed as

GenomicsArchaeaEstuariesGenome, ArchaealGeologic SedimentsMethanePhylogenyRiversSulfurMethaneSulfur

Identifiers

PMID26824177
PMCPMC4918440
OpenAlexW2341740777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.