Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26823997›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Characterisation of the human uterine microbiome in non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1-2 region of the 16S rRNA gene.

Hans Verstraelen, Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas, Fabian Desimpel, Ruy Jauregui, Nele Vankeirsbilck, Steven Weyers, Rita Verhelst, Petra De Sutter, Dietmar H Pieper, Tom Van De Wiele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of Genital Tract Microbiome in Fertility: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Effect of Oral ProbioticNutrients · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Presence and Dominance ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Discovering a new paradigm: Gut microbiota as a central modulator of sexual health.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Does Increased Estrogen Levels Affect The Number ofInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hans VerstraelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Ramiro Vilchez-VargasLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Fabian DesimpelFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Ruy JaureguiMicrobial Interactions and Processes (MINP) Research Group, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research , Braunschweig , Germany.
Nele VankeirsbilckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Steven WeyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Rita VerhelstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Petra De SutterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Dietmar H PieperMicrobial Interactions and Processes (MINP) Research Group, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research , Braunschweig , Germany.
Tom Van De WieleLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. It is widely assumed that the uterine cavity in non-pregnant women is physiologically sterile, also as a premise to the long-held view that human infants develop in a sterile uterine environment, though likely reflecting under-appraisal of the extent of the human bacterial metacommunity. In an exploratory study, we aimed to investigate the putative presence of a uterine microbiome in a selected series of non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1-2 hypervariable region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Methods. Nineteen women with various reproductive conditions, including subfertility, scheduled for hysteroscopy and not showing uterine anomalies were recruited. Subjects were highly diverse with regard to demographic and medical history and included nulliparous and parous women. Endometrial tissue and mucus harvesting was performed by use of a transcervical device designed to obtain endometrial biopsy, while avoiding cervicovaginal contamination. Bacteria were targeted by use of a barcoded Illumina MiSeq paired-end sequencing method targeting the 16S rRNA gene V1-2 region, yielding an average of 41,194 reads per sample after quality filtering. Taxonomic annotation was pursued by comparison with sequences available through the Ribosomal Database Project and the NCBI database. Results. Out of 183 unique 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences, 15 phylotypes were present in all samples. In some 90% of the women included, community architecture was fairly similar inasmuch B. xylanisolvens, B. thetaiotaomicron, B. fragilis and an undetermined Pelomonas taxon constituted over one third of the endometrial bacterial community. On the singular phylotype level, six women showed predominance of L. crispatus or L. iners in the presence of the Bacteroides core. Two endometrial communities were highly dissimilar, largely lacking the Bacteroides core, one dominated by L. crispatus and another consisting of a highly diverse community, including Prevotella spp., Atopobium vaginae, and Mobiluncus curtisii. Discussion. Our findings are, albeit not necessarily generalizable, consistent with the presence of a unique microbiota dominated by Bacteroides residing on the endometrium of the human non-pregnant uterus. The transcervical sampling approach may be influenced to an unknown extent by endocervical microbiota, which remain uncharacterised, and therefore warrants further validation. Nonetheless, consistent with our understanding of the human microbiome, the uterine microbiota are likely to have a previously unrecognized role in uterine physiology and human reproduction. Further study is therefore warranted to document community ecology and dynamics of the uterine microbiota, as well as the role of the uterine microbiome in health and disease.

Indexed as

16S ribosomal RNABacterial vaginosisEndometriumHuman microbiomeIlluminaMicrobiotaReproductionUterine microbiomeUterusVaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID26823997
PMCPMC4730988
OpenAlexW1655950349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.