ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
Diagnostic utility of PAX2 and PAX5 in distinguishing non-small cell lung cancer from small cell lung cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- PAX5 aberrant expression incorporated in MIPI-SP risk scoring system exhibits additive value in mantle cell lymphoma.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- PAX5 activates telomerase activity and proliferation in keloid fibroblasts by transcriptional regulation of SND1, thus promoting keloid growth in burn-injured skin.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Occupational exposure to pesticides is associated with differential DNA methylation.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women and consists of different histological types. Histopathological examination and accurate subtype diagnosis has become increasingly important in guiding patient management and, as such, is the most important currently available lung cancer "biomarker". In this study, we examined the expression of PAX2 and PAX5 by immunohistochemistry in 47 cases of lung cancer and 13 cases of pneumonia. The results demonstrated that PAX2 were detected in 82.8% (24/29) of NSCLC, 0% (0/18) of SCLC and 7.7% (1/13) of pneumonia, respectively; However, PAX5 were detected in 15/18 cases (83.3%) of SCLC, 6.8% (2/29) of NSCLC and 7.7% (1/13) of pneumonia. Further, the samples with lymphatic metastasis had remarkable higher positive PAX2 or PAX5 than that without metastases. Overall, our data indicated that PAX2 and PAX5 differentially expressed in NSCLC and SCLC. Thus, PAX2 and PAX5 are useful biomarker in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26823795PMC4713581W2416405189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.