Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26823785›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

Expression of CDKN1A/p21 and TGFBR2 in breast cancer and their prognostic significance.

Chang-Yuan Wei, Qi-Xing Tan, Xiao Zhu, Qing-Hong Qin, Fei-Bai Zhu, Qin-Guo Mo, Wei-Ping Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Epigenetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang-Yuan WeiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, China.
Qi-Xing TanDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, China.
Xiao ZhuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, China.
Qing-Hong QinDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, China.
Fei-Bai ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wenzhou Central Hospital Wenzhou 325000, China.
Qin-Guo MoDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, China.
Wei-Ping YangDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Nanning 530021, China.
Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CNWenzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA new diagnostic and prognostic biomarker may be of value in cancer diseases. Our study aimed to evaluate the CDKN1A/p21 and TGFBR2 level measurable in a cohort of patients with breast cancer after mastectomy, and to confirm their suitability to serve as prognostic biomarkers of the cancer.

methodsThe expression levels of CDKN1A/p21 and TGFBR2 were detected by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), western blot assay and immunohistochemical staining for 65 primary tumor samples and paired adjacent noncancerous breast tissues. Their relations to clinicopathologic parameters and to the prognosis of patients with breast cancer were analyzed.

resultsWe found the mRNA and protein expression levels of CDKN1A/p21 were significantly upregulated in breast cancer tissues compared with adjacent nontumorous breast tissues. Increased CDKN1A/p21 expression showed a significant correlation with larger tumor size (P=0.014), higher tumor dedifferentiation grade (P=0.021), lymph node metastasis (P=0.019) and a shorter disease-free survival (P=0.044). Contrarily, the expression levels of TGFBR2 mRNA and protein were significantly decreased in breast cancer tissues compared with adjacent nontumorous breast tissues. Underexpression of TGFBR2 in breast cancer was correlated with larger tumor size (P=0.034), lymph node metastasis (P=0.039) and a shorter disease-free survival (P=0.035). Statistical analysis suggested that there was no significant association between CDKN1A/p21 and TGFBR2 expression.

conclusionsin summary, our results suggested that high CDKN1A/p21 and low TGFBR2 expression was closely correlated with adverse pathological parameters and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Both CDKN1A/p21 and TGFBR2 are presented as possible candidates for breast cancer biomarkers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReceptors, Transforming Growth Factor betaBiomarkers, TumorCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesReceptors, Transforming Growth Factor betaReceptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type IIbiomarkerbreast cancerCDKN1A/p21TGFBR2

Identifiers

PMID26823785
PMCPMC4713571
OpenAlexW2414912604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.