ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
Survival prognosis and clinicopathological features of the lymph nodes along the left gastric artery in gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of left gastric artery lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Should the left gastric artery lymph node be considered as the predictive lymph node for extra-gastric lymph node metastases?Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Unplanned reoperation after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: causes, risk factors, and long-term prognostic influence.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines (third edition) have assigned No. 7 station left gastric artery lymph nodes (LNs) to the D1 range of lymphatic dissection. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, survival impact, and appropriateness of ascribing No. 7 station LNs to D1 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Patients (n=608) undergoing radical resection with No. 7 station LN dissection were recruited between January 1997 and June 2008. They were subdivided into four groups: N0, no LN metastasis; D1, LN without No. 7 station LN metastasis in the D1 lymphadenectomy region; No. 7, No. 7 station LN without LN metastasis in the D2 lymphadenectomy region; and D2, LN without No. 7 station LN metastasis in the D2 lymphadenectomy region. Of these, 17.2% (n=105) were positive for No. 7 LN metastasis, an important, independent prognostic factor associated with poor clinicopathological parameters, advanced tumor stage, and reduced survival. Tumor behavior in the No. 7 group was similar to that in the D2 group, but poorer than in the D1 group in terms of advanced tumor stage, with 5-year survival rates of 34.3%, 25.9% and 54.6%, respectively. Five-year survival rates in the No. 7 group were comparable to those in the D2 group (P>0.05), but significantly lower than in the D1 group (P<0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis established No. 3 and 9 station LN metastasis, node classification, and tumor-node-metastasis stage as independent risk factors for No. 7 station LN metastasis. Thus, No. 7 station LNs should be ascribed to D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26823752PMC4713538W2417044735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.