ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
Mixed group of Rhizobiales microbes in lung and blood of a patient with fatal pulmonary illness.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysbiosis of the Gut-Lung Axis and Its Immune Correlates During PulmonaryJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota and Autism Spectrum Disorders: Neurodevelopmental, Behavioral, and Gastrointestinal Interactions.Nutrients · 2025Article
- 16S rDNA analysis of the effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on pulmonary and intestinal flora.3 Biotech · 2017Review
- Comprehensive detection and identification of bacterial DNA in the blood of patients with sepsis and healthy volunteers using next-generation sequencing method - the observation of DNAemia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017Article
- Article
- The Hoops, Hopes, and Hypes of Human Microbiome Research.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the microbial composition in the diseased lung and early-phase microbial cultures from the blood of a patient with a rapidly progressing fatal pulmonary illness. Although no microbes could be isolated from such cultures during the initial study, the HTS-microbiome study revealed the presence of a unique mixture of alphaproteobacteria, composed mainly of different families of Rhizobiales microbes. Microbial 16S rDNA sequences matching closely to Afipia cberi were identified mainly in the patient's diseased lung tissue, but only rarely in the early-phase blood cultures. Conversely, the high abundance of sequences found in early-phase blood cultures of different broth media matched closely with those of the families Methylobacteriaceae, Phyllobacteriaceae and Sphingomonadaceae. The two species that successfully adapted to grow in a laboratory culture system were A. cberi and Mesorhizobium hominis, which eventually were isolated from a previously cryopreserved blood culture of SP4 broth. Many other species, including members of the Bradyrhizobiaceae and Phyllobacteriaceae families, and all members of the Methylobacteriaceae and Sphingomonadaceae families identified by HTS remained non-cultivated. We developed specific PCR primers and FISH probes, which detected the target Rhizobiales microbes in former blood cultures and autopsy lung tissues. It is unclear what role these Rhizobiales microbes might have played in the patient's complex disease process. However, the above mentioned assays should help in rapidly detecting and identifying these previously unrecognized Rhizobiales microbes in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26823697PMC4713483W2410092477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.