Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26823511›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

S McIntyre, I Birznieks, R M Vickery, A O Holcombe, T Seizova-Cajic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Illusory Motion Reversal in Touch.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S McIntyreSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia; and s.mcintyre@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-6533
I BirznieksNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia; and School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australia, Sydney, Australia.
R M VickeryNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australia, Sydney, Australia.
A O HolcombeSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;
T Seizova-CajicFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurophysiological studies in primates have found that direction-sensitive neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) generally increase their response rate with increasing speed of object motion across the skin and show little evidence of speed tuning. We employed psychophysics to determine whether human perception of motion direction could be explained by features of such neurons and whether evidence can be found for a speed-tuned process. After adaptation to motion across the skin, a subsequently presented dynamic test stimulus yields an impression of motion in the opposite direction. We measured the strength of this tactile motion aftereffect (tMAE) induced with different combinations of adapting and test speeds. Distal-to-proximal or proximal-to-distal adapting motion was applied to participants' index fingers using a tactile array, after which participants reported the perceived direction of a bidirectional test stimulus. An intensive code for speed, like that observed in SI neurons, predicts greater adaptation (and a stronger tMAE) the faster the adapting speed, regardless of the test speed. In contrast, speed tuning of direction-sensitive neurons predicts the greatest tMAE when the adapting and test stimuli have matching speeds. We found that the strength of the tMAE increased monotonically with adapting speed, regardless of the test speed, showing no evidence of speed tuning. Our data are consistent with neurophysiological findings that suggest an intensive code for speed along the motion processing pathways comprising neurons sensitive both to speed and direction of motion.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalMotionTouchTouch PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuronsadaptationhumanmotionpsychophysicstouch

Identifiers

PMID26823511
PMCPMC4808137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.