Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26823267›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Identifying depression among adolescents using three key questions: a validation study in primary care.

Wenche Haugen, Ole Rikard Haavet, Manjit Kaur Sirpal, Kaj Sparle Christensen

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrating primary mental health care and mental health promotion.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenche HaugenResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Ole Rikard HaavetDepartment of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Manjit Kaur SirpalDepartment of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kaj Sparle ChristensenResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression in adolescents is a serious psychiatric illness. GPs play an important role in identifying adolescents with depression and those at risk of developing depression. Few validated tools are suitable for identifying adolescent depression in general practice.

aimTo determine if three verbally asked key questions are valid for identifying depression in adolescents. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional, general practice multicentre, validation study was conducted in Oslo, Norway, and Aarhus, Denmark.

methodA total of 294 adolescents answered three verbally asked key questions followed by a Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for psychiatric diagnosis. Inclusion criteria were age (14-16 years) and fluency in the Norwegian or Danish language. The primary outcome was ROC curve statistics in terms of sensitivity and specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of the three key questions. Secondary outcomes were Loevinger's H, Cronbach's α, and prevalence of depression.

resultsThe three key questions met the criteria for construct and criterion validity for detecting depression among the adolescents. ROC curve statistics for the three key questions demonstrated an AUC of 0.79 for the answer 'yes' to either screening question and of 0.73 for the answer 'yes' to the help question. The positive predictive value was 31% and the negative predictive value was 97%.

conclusionThe three key questions are useful for identifying depression in adolescents in primary health care.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningNorwayPrevalencePsychometricsRetrospective StudiesROC Curveadolescentsdepressionprimary health carevalidation

Identifiers

PMID26823267
PMCPMC4723216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.