Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822968›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2016

One-year mortality associated with COPD treatment: a comparison of tiotropium and long-acting beta2-agonists in three Italian regions: results from the OUTPUL study.

Ursula Kirchmayer, Silvia Cascini, Nera Agabiti, Mirko Di Martino, Lisa Bauleo, Giulio Formoso, Claudio Voci, Riccardo Pistelli, Elisabetta Patorno, Marina Davoli and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ursula KirchmayerDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Silvia CasciniDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Nera AgabitiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Mirko Di MartinoDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Lisa BauleoDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Giulio FormosoEmilia-Romagna Regional Health and Social Care Agency, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio VociEmilia-Romagna Regional Health and Social Care Agency, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo PistelliDepartment of Respiratory Physiology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta PatornoBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
OUTPUL study group
Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale · ITCatholic University of America · USHarvard University · USRegione Emilia-Romagna

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong-acting bronchodilators, i.e. beta-2-agonists (LABA) and tiotropium are commonly used in COPD treatment. Choice of a specific agent is based on effectiveness and safety. Evidence yields controversial results with respect to mortality. The present study compared one-year mortality associated to treatment with tiotropium versus LABA.

methodsA population-based cohort study using data from Italian health information systems was performed. Patients aged 45+ years, discharged with COPD diagnosis in 2006-2009 were identified. Through record linkage with drug claims, patients who received a first prescription of LABA or tiotropium within 6 months after discharge were enrolled. The main analysis was restricted to naïve users (no prior use of either LABA or tiotropium). We used 'intention to treat' (ITT) and 'as treated' (AT) approaches. We followed patients for a maximum of 12 months. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by Cox regression including quintiles of propensity score. In sensitivity analysis patients receiving tiotropium + LABA combination were included in the tiotropium group.

resultsAmong the 33 891 enrolees, 28% were exposed to Tio, 56% to LABA, 16% to both. Overall mean age was 74 years and the mortality rate was 122/1000 person-years (py) at the ITT analysis and 108/1000 py at the AT analysis. The adjusted HR for tiotropium only compared with LABA only was 1.06 (95%CI: 0.94-1.20) at the ITT analysis and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.93-1.08) at the AT analysis. Results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

conclusionsIn this real-world study use of tiotropium was not associated with an increased risk of one-year mortality compared with LABA. © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedAged, 80 and overBronchodilator AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTiotropium BromideTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsTiotropium BromidecohortCOPDdrug treatmentmortalitypharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID26822968
PMCPMC5066679
OpenAlexW2290819591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.