Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822746›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Neurology2016

MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines.

Massimo Filippi, Maria A Rocca, Olga Ciccarelli, Nicola De Stefano, Nikos Evangelou, Ludwig Kappos, Alex Rovira, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Mar Tintorè, Jette L Frederiksen and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 359 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
359citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

359 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The coincidence of multiple sclerosis and primary vasculitis; from the bench of pathology to the bedside of treatment: a systematic review of case reports.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Sex- and age-specific associations ofAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the Type 4 Cerebrospinal Fluid Oligoclonal Band Pattern: Clinical and Paraclinical Features with Diagnostic Implications.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

299 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Massimo FilippiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: filippi.massimo@hsr.it.
Maria A RoccaNeuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Olga CiccarelliDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UCL/UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Nicola De StefanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Nikos EvangelouDivision of Neurosciences, Queen's Medical Centre Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ludwig KapposDepartment of Neurology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Alex RoviraMagnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (IDI), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume Sastre-GarrigaCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mar TintorèCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jette L FrederiksenDepartment of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claudio GasperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Jacqueline PalaceDepartment of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK.
Daniel S ReichTranslational Neuroradiology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brenda BanwellDivision of Child Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Xavier MontalbanCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Frederik BarkhofMS Centre Amsterdam, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
MAGNIMS Study Group

Funding

Multimodal MRI in Multiple SclerosisZIANS003119 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI REICH, DANIEL · 2010 to 2025
$53.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003119Medical Research Council MC_PC_12019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome, MRI can support and substitute clinical information in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by showing disease dissemination in space and time and by helping to exclude disorders that can mimic multiple sclerosis. MRI criteria were first included in the diagnostic work-up for multiple sclerosis in 2001, and since then several modifications to the criteria have been proposed in an attempt to simplify lesion-count models for showing disease dissemination in space, change the timing of MRI scanning to show dissemination in time, and increase the value of spinal cord imaging. Since the last update of these criteria, new data on the use of MRI to establish dissemination in space and time have become available, and MRI technology has improved. State-of-the-art MRI findings in these patients were discussed in a MAGNIMS workshop, the goal of which was to provide an evidence-based and expert-opinion consensus on proposed modifications to MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

ConsensusPractice Guidelines as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID26822746
PMCPMC4760851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.