Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822575›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2016

A panoply of errors: polymerase proofreading domain mutations in cancer.

Emily Rayner, Inge C van Gool, Claire Palles, Stephen E Kearsey, Tjalling Bosse, Ian Tomlinson, David N Church

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04761744 (A Phase II Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Genetic Alterations in DNA Damage Repair and Response Who Progressed After Standard Treatment for Metastatic Solid Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 209 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04761744 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Genetic Alterations in DNA Damage Repair and Response Who Progressed After Standard Treatment for Metastatic Solid Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorKorean Cancer Study GroupRan2019 to 2021Enrolled48ConditionsDDR Gene Mutation, Metastatic Solid TumorArmsNivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SecondaryJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily RaynerMolecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
Inge C van GoolDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Claire PallesMolecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
Stephen E KearseyDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Tjalling BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ian TomlinsonMolecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
David N ChurchMolecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
Centre for Human Genetics · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C6199/A10417Medical Research Council MR/L016591/1Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it has long been recognized that the exonucleolytic proofreading activity intrinsic to the replicative DNA polymerases Pol δ and Pol ε is essential for faithful replication of DNA, evidence that defective DNA polymerase proofreading contributes to human malignancy has been limited. However, recent studies have shown that germline mutations in the proofreading domains of Pol δ and Pol ε predispose to cancer, and that somatic Pol ε proofreading domain mutations occur in multiple sporadic tumours, where they underlie a phenotype of 'ultramutation' and favourable prognosis. In this Review, we summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of polymerase proofreading domain mutations in human malignancies, and highlight the potential utility of these variants as novel cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

MutationDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIDNA ReplicationEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasmsPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPrognosisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIPOLD1 protein, humanPOLE protein, humanPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26822575
OpenAlexW2252367299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.