Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822311›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Polypharmacy in chronic diseases-Reduction of Inappropriate Medication and Adverse drug events in older populations by electronic Decision Support (PRIMA-eDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Andreas Sönnichsen, Ulrike S Trampisch, Anja Rieckert, Giuliano Piccoliori, Anna Vögele, Maria Flamm, Tim Johansson, Aneez Esmail, David Reeves, Christin Löffler and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03901820 (Evaluation of a Drug Interactions Software to Limit Polypharmacy), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03901820 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Drug Interactions Software to Limit Polypharmacy (Evaluación de un Programa de Interacciones Medicamentosas Para Limitar la Polifarmacia)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Buenos AiresRan2019 to 2021Enrolled1,053ConditionsPolypharmacy, Elderly, Inpatient, Drug InteractionArmsMedication Interaction System of Dr App (SIMDA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Andreas SönnichsenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448, Witten, Germany. Andreas.Soennichsen@uni-wh.de.
Ulrike S TrampischInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
Anja RieckertInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
Giuliano PiccolioriSouth Tyrolian Academy of General Practice, Bolzano, Italy.
Anna VögeleSouth Tyrolian Academy of General Practice, Bolzano, Italy.
Maria FlammInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Tim JohanssonInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Aneez EsmailCentre of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David ReevesCentre of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Christin LöfflerInstitute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Jennifer HöckInstitute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Renate Klaassen-MielkeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
Hans Joachim TrampischDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
Ilkka KunnamoDuodecim Medical Publications, Helsinki, Finland.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEEurac Research · ITParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Rostock · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DEFinnish Medical Society Duodecim · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimorbidity is increasing in aging populations with a corresponding increase in polypharmacy as well as inappropriate prescribing. Depending on definitions, 25-50 % of patients aged 75 years or older are exposed to at least five drugs. Evidence is increasing that polypharmacy, even when guidelines advise the prescribing of each drug individually, can potentially cause more harm than benefit to older patients, due to factors such as drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Several approaches reducing polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing have been proposed, but evidence showing a benefit of these measures regarding clinically relevant endpoints is scarce. There is an urgent need to implement more effective strategies. We therefore set out to develop an evidence-based electronic decision support (eDS) tool to aid physicians in reducing inappropriate prescribing and test its effectiveness in a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial.

methodsThe "Polypharmacy in chronic diseases-Reduction of Inappropriate Medication and Adverse drug events in older populations" (PRIMA)-eDS tool is a tool comprising an indication check and recommendations for the reduction of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing based on systematic reviews and guidelines, the European list of inappropriate medications for older people, the SFINX-database of interactions, the PHARAO-database on adverse effects, and the RENBASE-database on renal dosing. The tool will be evaluated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 325 general practitioners (GPs) and around 3500 patients across five study centres in the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria and Italy. GP practices will be asked to recruit 11 patients aged 75 years or older who are taking at least eight medications and will be cluster-randomized after completion of patient recruitment. Intervention GPs will have access to the PRIMA-eDS tool, while control GPs will treat their patients according to current guidelines (usual care) without access to the PRIMA-eDS tool. After an observation time of 2 years, intervention and control groups will be compared regarding the primary composite endpoint of first non-elective hospitalization or death. DISCUSSION: The principal hypothesis is that reduction of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing can improve the clinical composite outcome of hospitalization or death. A positive result of the trial will contribute substantially to the improvement of care in multimorbidity. The trial is necessary to investigate not only whether the reduction of polypharmacy improves outcome, but also whether GPs and patients are willing to follow the recommendations of the PRIMA-eDS tool.

trial registrationThis trial has been registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. on 31 July 2014 (ISRCTN10137559).

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInappropriate PrescribingOutcome Assessment, Health CareSample Size

Identifiers

PMID26822311
PMCPMC5526277
OpenAlexW2260648135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.