Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822157›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2016

Surgical Treatment of NEN of Small Bowel: A Retrospective Analysis.

F M Watzka, C Fottner, M Miederer, M M Weber, A Schad, H Lang, T J Musholt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Surgical aspects of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of Removed Lymph Nodes on the Prognosis of M0 Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis from SEER Database.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F M WatzkaClinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
C FottnerEndocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
M MiedererClinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
M M WeberEndocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
A SchadInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
H LangClinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
T J MusholtClinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medicine Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. musholt@uni-mainz.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroendocrine Neoplasms of the small intestine have been noticed more frequently over the past 35 years. They constitute about 25% of all NENs and 29% of all tumors of the small intestine. Due to the predominantly indolent nature and overall good prognosis, the benefit of surgical treatment is still debated.

methodsIn a retrospective study, data of 83 surgically treated patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine, 48 males and 35 females with a median age of 62 years (range 25-86 years) were analyzed. Patient data were documented in the MaDoc database for neuroendocrine tumors of the University Medical Center of Mainz. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-Rank tests, censoring patients at the time of last follow-up, were used to compare the overall survival depending on potential prognostic factors (stage, grade, surgical treatment).

resultsAt the time of diagnoses, the most common clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (n = 31, 37.3%), bowel obstruction (n = 11, 13.3%), bowel perforation and peritonitis (n = 3, 3.6%), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 9, 10.8%), weight loss (n = 11, 13.3%), and carcinoid syndrome (n = 27, 32.5%). 65 patients (78.3%) had lymph node metastasis and in 58 patients (69.9%) distant metastasis were present. Segmental bowel resection (44) was the most common surgical procedure, followed by right hemi-colectomy (32) and explorative laparotomy (7). In most patients (78.9%), lymphadenectomy (systematic/selective) was performed. The 5-year survival of patients who underwent a systematic or a selective lymphadenectomy differed significantly (82.2 vs. 40.0%). The overall 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88.2, 80.3, and 71.0%, respectively.

conclusionMesenteric lymph node metastases are almost invariably present and have significant impact on patients' prognosis. Systematic lymphadenectomy prevents complications and improves the survival. Early surgical treatment should be the goal in order to prevent complications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26822157
OpenAlexW2260627124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.