Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822155›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2016

The Surgical Workforce and Surgical Provider Productivity in Sierra Leone: A Countrywide Inventory.

Håkon A Bolkan, Lars Hagander, Johan von Schreeb, Donald Bash-Taqi, Thaim B Kamara, Øyvind Salvesen, Arne Wibe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A cross-sectional study of caesarean deliveries performed by medical doctors and associate clinicians in nine district and regional hospitals in Sierra Leone using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. The International Awareness of Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Breast Reconstruction Practices and Barriers in West Africa: A Survey of Surgeons.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Håkon A BolkanDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. hakon.a.bolkan@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-4093
Lars HaganderPaediatric Surgery and Global Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan von SchreebHealth System and Policy Research Group, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Donald Bash-TaqiMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Thaim B KamaraDepartment of Surgery, Connaught Hospital and College of Medicine Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Øyvind SalvesenDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Arne WibeDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOKarolinska Institutet · SELund University · SEMinistry of Health and Sanitation · SLUniversity of Sierra Leone · SL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited data exist on surgical providers and their scope of practice in low-income countries (LICs). The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and productivity of all surgical providers in an LIC, and to evaluate correlations between the surgical workforce availability, productivity, rates, and volume of surgery at the district and hospital levels.

methodsData on surgeries and surgical providers from 56 (93.3 %) out of 60 healthcare facilities providing surgery in Sierra Leone in 2012 were retrieved between January and May 2013 from operation theater logbooks and through interviews with key informants.

resultsThe Sierra Leonean surgical workforce consisted of 164 full-time positions, equal to 2.7 surgical providers/100,000 inhabitants. Non-specialists performed 52.8 % of all surgeries. In rural areas, the densities of specialists and physicians were 26.8 and 6.3 times lower, respectively, compared with urban areas. The average individual productivity was 2.8 surgeries per week, and varied considerably between the cadres of surgical providers and locations. When excluding four centers that only performed ophthalmic surgery, there was a positive correlation between a facility's volume of surgery and the productivity of its surgical providers (r s = 0.642, p < 0.001).

conclusionsLess than half of all of the surgery in Sierra Leone is performed by specialists. Surgical providers were significantly more productive in healthcare facilities with higher volumes of surgery. If all surgical providers were as productive as specialists in the private non-profit sector (5.1 procedures/week), the national volume of surgery would increase by 85 %.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesUrban Health ServicesDeveloping CountriesEfficiencyHospitalsHumansNursesSierra LeoneSpecializationSurgeonsSurgical Procedures, OperativeWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID26822155
PMCPMC4868859
OpenAlexW2261154279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.